- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:44:58 -0800
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Jan/0035.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Amy Lewis, Asir Vedamuthu, Bijan Parsia, Sanjiva Weerawarana,
Jacek Kopecky, Prasad Yendluri, David Booth, Arthur Ryman,
Kevin Liu, Youenn Fablet, Roberto Chinnici, Allen Brookes
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- Jan 13 [.1]
- FTF minutes forthcoming...
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jan/att-0025/2005011
3-wsdl.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1]. Editorial actions [.2].
? 2004-04-01: Marsh will get schema tf going.
? 2004-09-02: Bijan to create stylesheet to generate a
table of components and properties.
? 2004-09-16: Editors to move App C to RDF Mapping spec,
except the frag-id which will move
within media-type reg appendix.
? 2004-09-16: Editors to fix paragraph 6-9 of section
2.1.1 moved into 2.1.2
which talks about the syntax.
? 2004-10-14: Editors to add a statement like:
The Style property may constrain both
input and output, however a particular
style may constrain in only one
direction. In Section 2.4.1.1 of Part 1.
(subsumed by LC21 resolution?)
? 2004-11-09: DBooth and Roberto to describe
option 2 (remove definition of processor
conformance, write up clear guidelines
to developers) (LC5f)
? 2004-11-09: DaveO to work on text for option
3 (redefining conformance in terms
of building the component model)
(LC5f)
? 2004-11-09: DaveO will recast the @compatibleWith
proposal using an extension namespace.
(LC54)
? 2004-11-10: Sanjiva to write the rationale for
rejecting LC75a
? 2004-11-10: Glen will post an e-mail describing
the compromise proposal on formal objections.
? 2004-11-10: Editor remove ambiguity if it exists
? 2004-11-10: Sanjiva will write up this proposal
and email it to the list as a response
to the objection.
? 2004-11-11: Anish to propose additions to the
test suite for the purpose of
interoperability testing.
? 2004-11-11: Editors of part 2 and 3 to add text
about WSDLMEP and SOAP mep mapping that
points to section 2.3 of part 3 (LC48b)
? 2004-11-18: DBooth to propose text to clarify that
a service must implement everything in
its description.
? 2004-11-18: Mini-task force to propose one or two
proposals for the group for LC5f.
? 2004-12-02: DBooth to draft note clarifying that
(a) optional extension can change the
semantics; and (b) that if semantics are
going to change at runtime, it should be
indicated in the WSDL
? 2004-12-03: Glen and Asir to help craft the specfic text
for the editors.
? 2004-12-03: Glen to send example on feature stuff for primer
? 2004-12-03: Hugo or JMarsh to write up schema group remarks
? 2004-12-16: Part 3 Editors to update the HTTP binding with
one of the above versions of text
? 2005-01-06: MTD Editors to add note saying content-type
is not sufficient, information to be
provided via other mechanism, for
example xsi:type"
? 2005-01-06: MTD editors implement proposal 2 for issue
260.
? 2005-01-06: Umit? to respond to Larry, "not dynamic,
other solutions equally bad, not
recommendation track, if problems
happy to consider those"
[AIs from FTF not yet included.]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/actions.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Good Standing:
- In danger: IONA, Agfa-Gevaert, SeeBeyond, DERI, Telecordia, HP,
Education.au Ltd.*, CA*
(* telcon attendance will restore Good Standing)
b. Mar 3,4 Boston [.1]
c. Review of WS-Chor LC [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TP2005/
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004Dec/0029.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Media Type Description issues [.1]
a. Issue 272 Architectural issues [.2]
- Awaiting more examples from Henry.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#detailList
[.2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-media-types/2004Nov/0011.h
tml
------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Last Call Issues [.1]. Comments list [.2]
TBD
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/
------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Include/Import issues
- Issue LC52a: Last call review comments (a) [.1]
- Issue LC60: Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNS? [.2]
- Issue LC74: Idle question [.3]
- Issue LC75s: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (s) [.4]
- Issue LC75t: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (t) [.5]
- Issue LC75w: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (w) [.6]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC52a
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC60
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC74
[.4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC75s
[.5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC75t
[.6] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC75w
------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Other issues if time allows (ha!)
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 23:58:01 UTC