- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:54:11 +0000
- To: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com> writes:
> If you want to generate a warning instead of an error, that means you'll
> have to compare the definitions. Do you think there is value in generating
> a warning as opposed to an error. Wouldn't it be simpler to just consider
> this an error?
Thing is, it's not an error in principle. XSV tries to avoid this
pblm by keeping track of URL/Namespace pairs and never doing one
twice, but this is clearly a case where that didn't work . . .
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Monday, 31 January 2005 11:54:19 UTC