www-ws-desc@w3.org from September 2002 by date

Monday, 30 September 2002

• Re: Arguments for keeping R120 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: Arguments for keeping R120 Martin Gudgin
• Re: Arguments for keeping R120 Philippe Le Hegaret
• Minutes 26 September 2002 WS Desc Telcon FABLET Youenn

Saturday, 28 September 2002

• RE: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Jeff Mischkinsky
• Re: Arguments for keeping R120 ryman@ca.ibm.com

Friday, 27 September 2002

• Re: Arguments for keeping R120 Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Arguments for keeping R120 ryman@ca.ibm.com
• Arguments for keeping R120 Eric Prud'hommeaux

Thursday, 26 September 2002

• RE: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute David Orchard
• Re: A slice at a proposal for SOAP features/properties in WSDL Jean-Jacques Moreau

Wednesday, 25 September 2002

• RE: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Martin Gudgin
• Agenda for 26 Sept 2002 WS Description WG Jonathan Marsh

Monday, 23 September 2002

• Minutes: 19 Sept 2002 WS Description WG Stumbo, William K

Friday, 20 September 2002

• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Jacek Kopecky

Thursday, 19 September 2002

• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Arthur Ryman
• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Arthur Ryman
• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Jacek Kopecky
• RE: proposal for changing binding for WSDL 1.2 Liu, Kevin

Wednesday, 18 September 2002

• Agenda for 19 Sept 2002 WS Description WG Jonathan Marsh
• Minutes 9-11 Sept WS Desc FTF meeting (consolidated) Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Ricky Ho
• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute ryman@ca.ibm.com
• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Ricky Ho
• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute ryman@ca.ibm.com
• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute ryman@ca.ibm.com
• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Issue 2: specifying protocol headers other than SOAPAction (was: SOAPAction) Jacek Kopecky

Tuesday, 17 September 2002

• Why <part element=...> Should be Dropped Arthur Ryman
• Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute Arthur Ryman
• Re: Redefinition of XML Schema in WSDL possible? Arthur Ryman
• RE: Redefinition of XML Schema in WSDL possible? David Cleary
• Redefinition of XML Schema in WSDL possible? Barbara.Zengler@daimlerchrysler.com

Thursday, 12 September 2002

• Issue 2: specifying protocol headers other than SOAPAction (was: SOAPAction) Jean-Jacques Moreau

Wednesday, 11 September 2002

• URIs and web services Paul Prescod
• Re: Mirror Ops (Output-Input/Solicit-Response, Output-Only/Notification) FABLET Youenn
• Mirror Ops (Output-Input/Solicit-Response, Output-Only/Notification) David Booth

Tuesday, 10 September 2002

• Re: slides for my thoughts on document/literal, message, etc. Philippe Le Hegaret
• RE: slides for my thoughts on document/literal, message, etc. Don Mullen
• slides for my thoughts on document/literal, message, etc. Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: proposal for changing binding for WSDL 1.2 Jacek Kopecky

Monday, 9 September 2002

• Re: New issue: Can the "use" attribute be eliminated? DGaertner@t-online.de
• harvesting wsdl Hao He
• RE: [Issues] WSDL and INLINE Schema Definitions Asir S Vedamuthu
• Re: [Issues] WSDL and INLINE Schema Definitions Suresh Nagar
• Re: How to specify the operational requirement in bindings ? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: [Issues] WSDL and INLINE Schema Definitions Sanjiva Weerawarana

Sunday, 8 September 2002

• Re: Port Type Inheritance Steve Graham

Saturday, 7 September 2002

• Re: [Issues] WSDL and INLINE Schema Definitions Sanjiva Weerawarana

Sunday, 8 September 2002

• Re: Port Type Inheritance Ricky Ho
• Re: How to specify the operational requirement in bindings ? Ricky Ho

Saturday, 7 September 2002

• Re: Port Type Inheritance Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: How to specify the operational requirement in bindings ? Sanjiva Weerawarana

Sunday, 8 September 2002

• RE: [Issues] WSDL and INLINE Schema Definitions Martin Gudgin

Saturday, 7 September 2002

• Port Type Inheritance Ricky Ho

Friday, 6 September 2002

• How to specify the operational requirement in bindings ? Ricky Ho
• Second Draft Sept WS Description WG FTF Jonathan Marsh
• RE: New issue: Can the "use" attribute be eliminated? Jonathan Marsh
• [Issues] WSDL and INLINE Schema Definitions Asir S Vedamuthu

Thursday, 5 September 2002

• Re: New issue: Can the "use" attribute be eliminated? Joyce Yang
• Minutes 05 September 2002 WS Desc telcon thrasher@lexmark.com
• RE: New issue: Can the "use" attribute be eliminated? Tim Ewald
• Re: New issue: Can the "use" attribute be eliminated? ryman@ca.ibm.com
• RE: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2 Liu, Kevin
• New issue: Can the "use" attribute be eliminated? Gaertner, Dietmar
• [Fwd: WS-Desc Telcon agenda item proposals, Issues 5 and 30 on encodingStyle] Arthur Ryman
• Re: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2 Martin Gudgin
• Re: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: recap of issue 51 (was: Agenda for 5 Sept 2002 WS Description WG - recap of issue 51) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: recap of issue 51 (was: Agenda for 5 Sept 2002 WS Description WG - recap of issue 51) Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2 Martin Gudgin
• Re: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: WSDL 1.2 Draft Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: recap of issue 51 (was: Agenda for 5 Sept 2002 WS Description WG - recap of issue 51) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: recap of issue 51 (was: Agenda for 5 Sept 2002 WS Description WG - recap of issue 51) Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Agenda for 5 Sept 2002 WS Description WG - recap of issue 51 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: [Fwd: Re: info on the soap-response stuff I mentioned on the call today] Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: [Fwd: Re: info on the soap-response stuff I mentioned on the call today] Jean-Jacques Moreau
• A slice at a proposal for SOAP features/properties in WSDL Glen Daniels
• RE: Agenda for 5 Sept 2002 WS Description WG - recap of issue 51 Liu, Kevin

Wednesday, 4 September 2002

• Agenda for 5 Sept 2002 WS Description WG Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 3 September 2002

• Reminder: WS Desc telcon Thursday 5 Sept 2002 Jonathan Marsh

Wednesday, 4 September 2002

• ¥h°£¸y»Ä­Iµh¡A3¤ÀÄÁ¨£®Ä David Wang

Last message date: Monday, 30 September 2002 12:10:19 UTC