Re: New issue: Can the "use" attribute be eliminated? from DGaertner@t-online.de on 2002-09-09 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from September 2002)

From: <DGaertner@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:47:35 -0400 (EDT)
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <1031589949.3d7cd03dbd017@webmail.t-online.de>

Okay, d'acord, rpc/literal makes sense.
Also, the answer to the main question behind this issue formulation,
does use="literal" encodingStyle="someURI" make sense, seems to to be yes.
(If use is literal, encodingStyle may be used to apply additional format
constraints.) In the light of this the issue is a non-issue.

Regards, Dietmar. 

> FYI - the current thinking in WS-I.org is to support doc/literal and
> rpc/literal, so yes rpc/literal makes sense. IMHO, SOAP encoding has caused
> a lot of interop headaches. Life would be simpler if literal was all we
> needed to support.
>
> Arthur Ryman

Received on Monday, 9 September 2002 12:51:15 UTC