- From: FABLET Youenn <fablet@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:51:32 +0200
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
It is interesting to note that:
- in/out and out/in ops relie on the request/response MEP
- in and out ops relie on the one way MEP
It seems therefore sensible to say that for each newly created MEP (like
a OneRequest/MultipleResponses that would be great for pub-sub stuff), 2
new types of operations will be created, hence a need to extend twice the
bindings (for the current WSDL).
IMO, it would be better to have only one type of operation per MEP
(therefore removing out/in and out operations) by using something like
roberto's proposal (mirror-able portTypes for instance).
Youenn
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2002 10:50:02 UTC