A while ago, the WG decided to generalize the "soapAction" header mechanism to other protocol headers. I took a todo to provide the corresponding write up. Here is that write up. Jean-Jacques. --------------------- Summary The "soapAction" attribute is used to specify the value of the "SOAPAction" HTTP header field. Two issues: 1. SOAP 1.2 has replaced "SOAPAction" with the "action" parameter on the HTTP Content-Type header field. 2. There is a desire from the WG to replaced the specific, ad-hoc "soapAction" attribute by a mechanims which works for other headers (and possibly other protocols). Proposal 1. Remove the "soapAction" attribute 2. Introduce instead an <http:field> element to the HTTP binding. 3. Introduce an equivalent <soap:field> element to the SOAP binding. 4. Both elements would be direct descendents of the <input> and <output> elements. Grammar The grammar for <http:field> is as follows. The grammer for <soap:field> is equivalent <http:field name="http-header-field-name" value="http-header-field-value"?>? <http:parameter name="parameter-name" value="parameter-value"?>? </http:field> Description When present in a WSDL description, the <http:field> and <http:parameter> indicate that the corresponding header field or parameter MUST be present in the inbound message or WILL be present in the outbound message (depending on whether they appear in <input> or <ouput>). The "value" attribute for <http:field> or <http:parameter> MAY be omitted, indicating that it may not be known in advance. Example: Content-Length or a cipher. When a value is supplied, this value MUST be present in the inbound or outbound message. Examples <http:field name="X-MD5-Hash"/> <soap:field name="Content-Type" value="application/soap+xml"> <soap:field name="action" value="http://example.org/fishTheTrouts"/> <soap:field name="charset" value="utf-16"/> </soap:field> Variants An alternative would be to combine the <http:field> and <soap:field> element into a single <wsdl:field> element. Each binding would then indicate how this element would be interpreted.Received on Thursday, 12 September 2002 11:16:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:25 UTC