attached mail follows:
> This note addresses item 12 of > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0135.html There appears to be a consensus on how to handle two encodingStyle issues [1] (and replies). [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0178.html 1. Value of the encodingStyle attribute. Everyone agrees that we should restrict the value of the encodingStyle attribute to be either empty (for literal) or a single URI (for encodings like SOAP encoding). This is approach taken in SOAP 2.2. Dietmar [2] further suggested that we reference the definition of this attribute from the SOAP 1.2 envelope schema. We should discuss this suggestion further. On the surface, it seems reasonable. I assume that the only place where this attribute appears is in the SOAP binding extension schema, in which case it seems reasonable to import the SOAP envelope schema. I assume that we'll need a SOAP binding schema for each version of SOAP, i.e. that if SOAP changes, then we will probably have to update the binding. Therefore it is OK to import the schema for the version of SOAP we are binding to. [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0039.html 2. Where can you put the encodingStyle attribute. There is general agreement that we need more flexibility in where we put the encodingStyle attribute, i.e. people feel that encodingStyle might change in different parts of the message. Limiting the attribute to the <body> element is too restrictive. Jean-Jacques [3] says that SOAP 1.2 only allows the attribute on header blocks, body blocks, and fault details (and all their descendents). Jean-Jacques [4] suggested that it would be sufficient to allow encodingStyle to be specified on each message block (and presumably also fault detail) but not their descendants. i.e. each block has a single encodingStyle. This seems like a good compromise. [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0231.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0233.html > WS-Desc Telcon agenda item proposals > > From: Gaertner, Dietmar (Dietmar.Gaertner@softwareag.com) > Date: Mon, Jul 08 2002 > > *Next message: Jonathan Marsh: "Reminder: WS Desc telcon Thursday 11 July 2002" > > * Previous message: Gaertner, Dietmar: "[soaptf]Telcon Minutes, July 8" > * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] > * Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists] > * Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Message-ID: <DFF2AC9E3583D511A21F0008C7E62106038CC04E@daemsg02.software-ag.de> > From: "Gaertner, Dietmar" <Dietmar.Gaertner@softwareag.com> > To: "'jmarsh@microsoft.com'" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> > Cc: "'w3c-ws-desc@w3.org'" <w3c-ws-desc@w3.org> > Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:04:55 +0200 > Subject: WS-Desc Telcon agenda item proposals > > Hi Jonathan, > > the SOAP task force has two items which we would like to be clarified, > if possible, in the next group telcon: > > 1. "encodingStyle" attribute, issue 30 and resolution proposal [1] + > responses > 2. "use" attribute elimination as proposed in [2] and discussed in [3] > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0039.html > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0039.html> > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0039.html > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0039.html> > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Jul/0015.html > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Jul/0015.html> > > Regards, Dietmar. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > * Next message: Jonathan Marsh: "Reminder: WS Desc telcon Thursday 11 July 2002" > * Previous message: Gaertner, Dietmar: "[soaptf]Telcon Minutes, July 8" > * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] > * Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists] > * Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ] -- Arthur RymanReceived on Thursday, 5 September 2002 11:43:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:25 UTC