www-ws-desc@w3.org from September 2002 by author

Anne Thomas Manes

RE: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Thursday, 19 September)

Arthur Ryman

Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Thursday, 19 September)
Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Thursday, 19 September)
Why <part element=...> Should be Dropped (Tuesday, 17 September)
Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Tuesday, 17 September)
Re: Redefinition of XML Schema in WSDL possible? (Tuesday, 17 September)
[Fwd: WS-Desc Telcon agenda item proposals, Issues 5 and 30 on encodingStyle] (Thursday, 5 September)

Asir S Vedamuthu

RE: [Issues] WSDL and INLINE Schema Definitions (Monday, 9 September)
[Issues] WSDL and INLINE Schema Definitions (Friday, 6 September)

Barbara.Zengler@daimlerchrysler.com

Redefinition of XML Schema in WSDL possible? (Tuesday, 17 September)

David Booth

Mirror Ops (Output-Input/Solicit-Response, Output-Only/Notification) (Wednesday, 11 September)

David Cleary

RE: Redefinition of XML Schema in WSDL possible? (Tuesday, 17 September)

David Orchard

RE: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Thursday, 26 September)

David Wang

�h��y�ĭI�h�A3�� (Wednesday, 4 September)

DGaertner@t-online.de

Re: New issue: Can the "use" attribute be eliminated? (Monday, 9 September)

Don Mullen

RE: slides for my thoughts on document/literal, message, etc. (Tuesday, 10 September)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

Re: Arguments for keeping R120 (Monday, 30 September)
Arguments for keeping R120 (Friday, 27 September)

FABLET Youenn

Minutes 26 September 2002 WS Desc Telcon (Monday, 30 September)
Re: Mirror Ops (Output-Input/Solicit-Response, Output-Only/Notification) (Wednesday, 11 September)

Gaertner, Dietmar

New issue: Can the "use" attribute be eliminated? (Thursday, 5 September)

Glen Daniels

A slice at a proposal for SOAP features/properties in WSDL (Thursday, 5 September)

Hao He

harvesting wsdl (Monday, 9 September)

Jacek Kopecky

Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Friday, 20 September)
Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Friday, 20 September)
Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Thursday, 19 September)
Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Thursday, 19 September)
Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Wednesday, 18 September)
Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Wednesday, 18 September)
Re: Issue 2: specifying protocol headers other than SOAPAction (was: SOAPAction) (Wednesday, 18 September)
RE: proposal for changing binding for WSDL 1.2 (Tuesday, 10 September)
Re: recap of issue 51 (was: Agenda for 5 Sept 2002 WS Description WG - recap of issue 51) (Thursday, 5 September)
Re: recap of issue 51 (was: Agenda for 5 Sept 2002 WS Description WG - recap of issue 51) (Thursday, 5 September)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

Re: A slice at a proposal for SOAP features/properties in WSDL (Thursday, 26 September)
Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Wednesday, 18 September)
Issue 2: specifying protocol headers other than SOAPAction (was: SOAPAction) (Thursday, 12 September)
Re: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2 (Thursday, 5 September)
Re: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2 (Thursday, 5 September)
Re: recap of issue 51 (was: Agenda for 5 Sept 2002 WS Description WG - recap of issue 51) (Thursday, 5 September)
Re: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2 (Thursday, 5 September)
Re: WSDL 1.2 Draft (Thursday, 5 September)
Re: recap of issue 51 (was: Agenda for 5 Sept 2002 WS Description WG - recap of issue 51) (Thursday, 5 September)
Re: Agenda for 5 Sept 2002 WS Description WG - recap of issue 51 (Thursday, 5 September)
Re: [Fwd: Re: info on the soap-response stuff I mentioned on the call today] (Thursday, 5 September)
Re: [Fwd: Re: info on the soap-response stuff I mentioned on the call today] (Thursday, 5 September)

Jeff Mischkinsky

RE: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Saturday, 28 September)

Jonathan Marsh

Agenda for 26 Sept 2002 WS Description WG (Wednesday, 25 September)
Agenda for 19 Sept 2002 WS Description WG (Wednesday, 18 September)
Minutes 9-11 Sept WS Desc FTF meeting (consolidated) (Wednesday, 18 September)
Second Draft Sept WS Description WG FTF (Friday, 6 September)
RE: New issue: Can the "use" attribute be eliminated? (Friday, 6 September)
Agenda for 5 Sept 2002 WS Description WG (Wednesday, 4 September)
Reminder: WS Desc telcon Thursday 5 Sept 2002 (Tuesday, 3 September)

Joyce Yang

Re: New issue: Can the "use" attribute be eliminated? (Thursday, 5 September)

Liu, Kevin

RE: proposal for changing binding for WSDL 1.2 (Thursday, 19 September)
RE: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2 (Thursday, 5 September)
RE: Agenda for 5 Sept 2002 WS Description WG - recap of issue 51 (Thursday, 5 September)

Martin Gudgin

RE: Arguments for keeping R120 (Monday, 30 September)
RE: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Wednesday, 25 September)
RE: [Issues] WSDL and INLINE Schema Definitions (Sunday, 8 September)
RE: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2 (Thursday, 5 September)
RE: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2 (Thursday, 5 September)

Paul Prescod

URIs and web services (Wednesday, 11 September)

Philippe Le Hegaret

Re: Arguments for keeping R120 (Monday, 30 September)
Re: Arguments for keeping R120 (Friday, 27 September)
Re: slides for my thoughts on document/literal, message, etc. (Tuesday, 10 September)

Ricky Ho

Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Wednesday, 18 September)
Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Wednesday, 18 September)
Re: Port Type Inheritance (Sunday, 8 September)
Re: How to specify the operational requirement in bindings ? (Sunday, 8 September)
Port Type Inheritance (Saturday, 7 September)
How to specify the operational requirement in bindings ? (Friday, 6 September)

ryman@ca.ibm.com

Re: Arguments for keeping R120 (Saturday, 28 September)
Re: Arguments for keeping R120 (Friday, 27 September)
Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Wednesday, 18 September)
Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Wednesday, 18 September)
Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Wednesday, 18 September)
Re: New issue: Can the "use" attribute be eliminated? (Thursday, 5 September)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Thursday, 19 September)
Re: Rationale for Dropping the <soap:body use=...> Attribute (Thursday, 19 September)
slides for my thoughts on document/literal, message, etc. (Tuesday, 10 September)
Re: How to specify the operational requirement in bindings ? (Monday, 9 September)
Re: [Issues] WSDL and INLINE Schema Definitions (Monday, 9 September)
Re: [Issues] WSDL and INLINE Schema Definitions (Saturday, 7 September)
Re: Port Type Inheritance (Saturday, 7 September)
Re: How to specify the operational requirement in bindings ? (Saturday, 7 September)

Steve Graham

Re: Port Type Inheritance (Sunday, 8 September)

Stumbo, William K

Minutes: 19 Sept 2002 WS Description WG (Monday, 23 September)

Suresh Nagar

Re: [Issues] WSDL and INLINE Schema Definitions (Monday, 9 September)

thrasher@lexmark.com

Minutes 05 September 2002 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 5 September)

Tim Ewald

RE: New issue: Can the "use" attribute be eliminated? (Thursday, 5 September)

Last message date: Monday, 30 September 2002 12:10:19 UTC