Re: [Fwd: Re: info on the soap-response stuff I mentioned on the call today] from Jean-Jacques Moreau on 2002-09-05 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from September 2002)

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 09:15:37 +0200
To: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@apache.org>, www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <3D770499.7020307@crf.canon.fr>

Added as issue #67.

Jean-Jacques.

Paul Prescod wrote:
> Issue:
> 
> In addition to R085 there is a small syntactic issue. WSDL must make it
> possible to invoke an HTTP method like GET with no arguments, for the
> case where the endpoint URI *is* the URI you want to GET. In other
> words, http:operation/@location should be optional. I notice that
> soap:operation has an issue to be made optional so there is some good
> symmetry there.

Received on Thursday, 5 September 2002 03:15:47 UTC