- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:17:40 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Dial in information (members only) [0]:
[0] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Sep/0000.html
See the public WG page [1] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [2] for administrative matters.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is:
Jochen Ruetschlin (fallback Bill Stumbo, Sandra Swearingen, Jerry
Thrasher, Steve Tuecke, William Vambenepe, Don Wright, Joyce Yang)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes [3]. Pallavi and Barbara sent late regrets.
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0135.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items.
? 2002-07-21: GlenD and JJM to write up proposal for handling
MEPs with regard to Soap
? 2002-07-21: GLEN & Sanjiva to write up the comment about MEPs
& features to XMLP group
? 2002-07-21: GlenD to send DavidB details on hosting November
F2F
PENDING 2002-07-21: JM to decide potential November F2F overlap on Wed
Nov 13 with Arch
? 2002-07-21: Jeffrey & Gudge to flesh out a proposal for
omitting operation from soap binding
? 2002-07-21: Don Mullen to write up an issue on transport
attribute
DONE [4] 2002-07-25: Glen write up an issue on transport URIs compliance
with SOAP
? 2002-07-25: Sanjiva and Gudge to work on combining the AM
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0132.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
4. SOAP 1.2 Last Call [9, 10, 11] call for review [12]. Awaiting text
from Glen and/or Sanjiva. I think we missed the boat on this one.
[9] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/
[10] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/
[11] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0001.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
5. FTF Agenda
Review, rearrange and augment first draft of the agenda [13]. Note that
the facilities don't accommodate overlapping groups, and we will thus
plan to end at noon on Wed.
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Sep/0004.html
(members only)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
6. New Issues
Philippe points out a couple of public comments on the public comments
list [13]. What process do we want to follow (pre-last-call) to respond
to these comments and make sure real ones appear on our issues list?
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/
--------------------------------------------------------------------
7. SOAP TF Status? Need more meetings? Is [15] the output?
Conclusions so far:
(1) We need to be able to express MEPs in the SOAP binding.
(2) The ability to describe features and MEPs at the abstract level
would be a good thing, but right now we don't know how much effort
it would take to do so.
(3) Feedback to XMLP WG: lack of something (such as a header) to
express the MEP in use. (Glen: perhaps we should say that, for
each binding, there must be a way to identify unambiguously the
MEP in use; of course, for bindings that support just one MEP
that's a no-op).
(4) Currently, there is no well-defined one-way MEP.
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0034.html
This topic was deferred last time. Is there anything more we need to do
here?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Proposal: Hoisting SOAP binding attributes [16]. Roberto's amendment
at [17].
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0058.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0105.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Issue 51: Asymmetry between soap:body and soap:header [18]. Thread
starts at [19] (Kevin), continues at [20] and [21].
[18] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x51
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0048.html
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0049.html
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0081.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue 25: Interaction between W3C XML Schema and SOAP Data Model
Gudge's explains at [22], Roberto's options at [23].
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0186.html
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0071.html
FTF?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue 5: EncodingStyle
Issue 30: soap:body encodingStyle
Dietmar's soaptf proposal for encoding and use attributes. [24]
Arthur's recommendations. [25, 26]
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Jul/0016.html
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0178.html
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0178.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue 18: Default for transport of <soap:binding> [27]. Jeffrey's
proposal at [28].
[27]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html#
x18
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0122.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
13. HTTP Binding Issues (6a, 41)
Jeffrey recommends no change [29].
Sanjiva is mulling this over [30].
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0102.html
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0067.html
- Jonathan
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 14:17:48 UTC