Monday, 28 September 1998
- Querying WebDAV Hierarchical Properties -- The Proposal
- Querying WebDAV Hierarchical Properties -- Motivation
Tuesday, 22 September 1998
Saturday, 19 September 1998
Friday, 18 September 1998
Wednesday, 16 September 1998
Tuesday, 15 September 1998
- RE: no empty strings in DAV
- RE: Null values
- RE: Proposal for Paged Results
- RE: DASL Protocol: sharpsign in 1.5
Monday, 14 September 1998
- RE: no empty strings in DAV
- RE: Null values
- RE: DASL Protocol: sharpsign in 1.5
- no empty strings in DAV
- Null values
- DASL Protocol: sharpsign in 1.5
- Re: Proposal for Paged Results
- use meta syntax in DTD
Tuesday, 8 September 1998
Saturday, 5 September 1998
Friday, 4 September 1998
Wednesday, 2 September 1998
Sunday, 30 August 1998
Friday, 28 August 1998
Saturday, 29 August 1998
Friday, 28 August 1998
- RE: Structure criteria for DASL queries
- RE: Structure criteria for DASL queries
- what kinds of structure criteria are needed?
- DAV object model expressed as tables
- Structure criteria for DASL queries
Friday, 31 July 1998
Thursday, 30 July 1998
Wednesday, 29 July 1998
Tuesday, 28 July 1998
Monday, 27 July 1998
Sunday, 26 July 1998
Saturday, 25 July 1998
- Re: Issue: Are structure queries needed?
- Better version of QSD for simplesearch
- RE: replacement for 7.19.1 rank
- replacement for 7.19.1 rank
- RE: proposal: replace 'rank' property with score'
- RE: proposal: replace 'rank' property with score'
- RE: proposal: replace 'rank' property with score'
Friday, 24 July 1998
- withdraw proposal to drop sortby from simplesearch
- proposal: replace 'rank' property with score'
- RE: Towards DASL fulltextsearch query
- Re: drop sortby from simplesearch
- RE: drop sortby from simplesearch
- RE: drop sortby from simplesearch
- Towards DASL fulltextsearch query
- drop sortby from simplesearch
- STARTS reference
Thursday, 23 July 1998
Wednesday, 22 July 1998
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- Issue: Are structure queries needed?
- Re: datatyping is not needed
- There are no famous dead
- RE: What it means to be dead
- On the life and death
- What it means to be dead
Tuesday, 21 July 1998
- origins of the famous dead
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- Re: datatyping is not needed
Sunday, 19 July 1998
Saturday, 18 July 1998
Friday, 17 July 1998
Thursday, 16 July 1998
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: Arbiter must merge the metadata of scope list elements
Wednesday, 15 July 1998
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: Bug in the DTD? (Three Valued Logic and Elimination Necessa ry ?)
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: "Where" condition too general vis a vis "contains"
- Re: "Where" condition too general vis a vis "contains"
- RE: Bug in the DTD? (Three Valued Logic and Elimination Necessary ?)
Tuesday, 14 July 1998
- Re: Bug in the DTD? (Three Valued Logic and Elimination Necessary ?)
- RE: Bug in the DTD? (Three Valued Logic and Elimination Necessary ?)
- Bug in the DTD? (Three Valued Logic and Elimination Necessary?)
Monday, 13 July 1998
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: datatyping is not needed
Sunday, 12 July 1998
Friday, 10 July 1998
Thursday, 9 July 1998
Tuesday, 7 July 1998
- broaden 'scope' to be any kind of resource, not just collection resource.
- Must scopes be collections?
- RE: Major flaw: inability to query within structure
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- Re: Arbiter must merge the metadata of scope list elements
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: Major flaw: inability to query within structure
- Re: Three Valued Logic and Elimination Defined
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- RE: datatyping is not needed
- datatyping is not needed
Friday, 3 July 1998
- How NOT to support structure query
- How to support XML structure query
- Major flaw: inability to query within structure
- Re: Scenario Examples