- From: Jim Davis <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 13:16:06 PDT
- To: "Babich, Alan" <ABabich@filenet.com>, "'Dale Lowry'" <Lowry.Dale@gw.novell.com>, www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
At 11:18 AM 7/21/98 PDT, Babich, Alan wrote: >... The WebDAV >spec. defines live and dead properties in section >3.1, but if the spec. defines obscure and famous dead >properties, I managed to overlook that (sorry). The term was first used in my email message of Mon, 13 Jul 1998 12:19:58 PDT, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webdav-dasl/1998JulSep/0026.html It is in neither WebDAV nor DASL specs, nor should it be. It's only useful for discussing scenarios and implementations. In no way should the protocol make use of this distinction. Alan's definition of famous as "in the DMS schema" seems correct to me, for those implementations of DASL that use a DMS. Note that oher applications of DASL might not use a DMS underneath. The way a dead property becomes famous is by having the server know enough about it to index it, which seems pretty similar to being in the schema.
Received on Tuesday, 21 July 1998 16:16:43 UTC