- From: Jim Davis <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 18:27:00 PDT
- To: "'John Stracke'" <francis@netscape.com>, "'DASL'" <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
Omission of NOT was just a typo. I daresay Saveen will fix it soon. As you correctly point out, once you add NOT to the set of operators, then you do indeed need the third value. I will assume that we (still) have concensus on the need for three valued logic unless I hear otherwise. Please speak up if you (or anyone else) objects. It is fine to let silence mean consent.
Received on Tuesday, 14 July 1998 21:32:29 UTC