- From: Saveen Reddy (Exchange) <saveenr@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 23:52:17 -0700
- To: "'DASL'" <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
Concerning the omission of NOT, I will fix this typo in the next version of the draft. -Saveen -----Original Message----- From: Jim Davis [mailto:jdavis@parc.xerox.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 1998 6:27 PM To: 'John Stracke'; 'DASL' Subject: RE: Bug in the DTD? (Three Valued Logic and Elimination Necessary ?) Omission of NOT was just a typo. I daresay Saveen will fix it soon. As you correctly point out, once you add NOT to the set of operators, then you do indeed need the third value. I will assume that we (still) have concensus on the need for three valued logic unless I hear otherwise. Please speak up if you (or anyone else) objects. It is fine to let silence mean consent.
Received on Wednesday, 15 July 1998 02:52:00 UTC