- From: Babich, Alan <ABabich@filenet.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 11:29:46 -0700
- To: "'Jim Davis'" <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>, www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
So someone writing the result set merging code can write the code -- it needs to know whether a sort is required to avoid a redundant sort. Merging N sorted lists is easier and faster than doing a sort. Some middleware wouldn't even want to offer ordered results unless it could do a merge on sorted result lists, because then it would have to have a sort routine. Alan Babich -----Original Message----- From: Jim Davis [mailto:jdavis@parc.xerox.com] Sent: July 07, 1998 1:55 PM To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org Subject: Re: Arbiter must merge the metadata of scope list elements At 03:13 PM 6/30/98 PDT, Babich, Alan wrote: (apropos a search that has more than one scope and has sorting) > DASL must become explicit on [whether] (1) each >scope element must return ordered results to the arbiter, or >(2) the search arbiter does all the sorting. Why must it be explicit about this? Why would a client care?
Received on Thursday, 16 July 1998 14:32:40 UTC