www-voice@w3.org from October to December 2001 by date

Friday, 28 December 2001

• More questions, SUBMIT without namelist? Markku Savela

Thursday, 20 December 2001

• MITRE comments on Semantic Interpretation WD John Aberdeen

Friday, 14 December 2001

• Re: Using Record TAG Ian Sutherland
• Re: "count" attribute in catch? Markku Savela
• Re: "count" attribute in catch? Markku Savela
• "count" attribute in catch? Markku Savela
• Using Record TAG Abhilash_Shanmugham
• RE: CCXML ALOK KUMAR VERMA

Thursday, 13 December 2001

• Re: CCXML John_Potemri@nmss.com

Wednesday, 12 December 2001

• Comments on VoiceXML 2.0 Working Draft 23rd October 2001 Matthew Wilson
• Re: CCXML RJ Auburn
• Re: CCXML Hari Kishan N
• Re: CCXML RJ Auburn
• CCXML Arun Prasad
• Re: flow control Shridhar Damle
• RE: flow control Eric Burger

Tuesday, 11 December 2001

• flow control HO,ELWIN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)

Saturday, 8 December 2001

• check this out guys Valerie@yahoo.com

Monday, 3 December 2001

• Acceptance power of Speech Recognition Grammars Konduru, Sudhakara

Friday, 30 November 2001

• form/menu grammars with document scope? Markku Savela
• VoiceXML in Arabic Adarsh G

Thursday, 29 November 2001

• Virus Alert Alan Thomas
• VoiceXML in Arabic Adarsh G
• Protocols on browser?? Hari Kishan N

Wednesday, 28 November 2001

• RE: Comments on VoiceXML 2.0 Scott McGlashan
• RE: VoiceXML 2.0 comments Scott McGlashan
• RE: Prompt counting question Scott McGlashan

Tuesday, 27 November 2001

• call origination Enrico Silterra

Saturday, 24 November 2001

• Using 'Semantic Interpretation for Speech Recognition' to parse XML to the Infoset Sjoerd Visscher

Friday, 23 November 2001

• Questions from a novice Bob Zenhausern
• VoiceXML 2.0 comments George Clelland

Saturday, 17 November 2001

• The Open Source Initiative OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy. DonEMitchell

Friday, 16 November 2001

• Re: re[2]: The Open Source Initiative OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy. Samuel_Delagarza@countrywide.com
• Re: re[2]: The Open Source Initiative OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy. Brett Serkez, Techie
• [www-voice] <none> Angus MacKinnon
• re[2]: The Open Source Initiative OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy. Jonathan Eisenzopf
• Re: The Open Source Initiative OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy. Brett Serkez, Techie
• RE: The Open Source Initiative OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy. Eric Burger

Thursday, 15 November 2001

• Prompt counting question Teemu Tingander

Wednesday, 14 November 2001

• [www-voice] <none> ADFM@SHAW
• unsubscirbe Serradó Escriu, Jordi
• RE: The Open Source Initiative OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy. Charles F. Munat
• [www-voice] <none> Simon Berglund
• RE: The Open Source Initiative OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy. Dan Fraisl
• Re: The Open Source Initiative OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy. Turner W. Rentz, III
• The Open Source Initiative OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy. Brett Serkez, Techie

Tuesday, 13 November 2001

• questions regarding mapping results from form-level grammars Linda Lin

Friday, 9 November 2001

• Re: Comments on VoiceXML 2.0 Nils Klarlund

Thursday, 8 November 2001

• Comments on VoiceXML 2.0 Samuel L. Bayer

Wednesday, 31 October 2001

• unsuscribed Megidd@aol.com
• RE: Which "gateway" is best? Hitesh.Seth@silverline.com
• RE: Which "gateway" is best? Srinivas Penumaka
• Which "gateway" is best? M. Lance Hilliard
• RE: database reading through voiceXML LAVALLEE,LIONEL (HP-PaloAlto,ex1)
• RE: database reading through voiceXML Liang Shen
• RE: database reading through voiceXML LAVALLEE,LIONEL (HP-PaloAlto,ex1)
• RE: database reading through voiceXML Liang Shen
• unsuscribed Michel Généreux
• RE: database reading through voiceXML Nitin_Khungar
• Patent Licensing Issues for the VoiceXML 2.0 Standard Daniel E. Maddux
• RE: database reading through voiceXML Eric Burger
• database reading through voiceXML Shridhar Damle

Tuesday, 30 October 2001

• RE: running voicexml application John Hicks
• RE: running voicexml application daniel smith
• RE: running voicexml application Kevin Chatow
• Re: running voicexml application Adarsh G
• RE: running voicexml application Judith NATAF
• running voicexml application Adarsh G

Thursday, 25 October 2001

• Evaluation of expr in <param ...>? Markku Savela
• Re: Patents and VoiceXML 2.0 Wendy Atkinson

Wednesday, 24 October 2001

• Patents and standards Randy Wright
• Thanks... parfitt
• Patents and VoiceXML 2.0 Cary Lancaster
• RAND, patents and VoiceXML 2.0 Samuel Bayer
• Patents Charles Hixson
• VoiceXML and patents Jesper Juhl
• Regarding Patents in XML technologies Larry Garfield
• Patents, royalties and W3C recommendations Zak McGregor

Tuesday, 23 October 2001

• A feeling for IP, patents, and w3c John C Jones
• News Release: World Wide Web Consortium Issues First Public Working Draft of VoiceXML 2.0 Janet Daly
• VoiceXML 2.0 spec now public Dave Raggett

Tuesday, 9 October 2001

• Personal comments on Speech Recognition Grammar Spec last call MWinston@energis.co.uk
• Personal comments on Speech Recognition Grammar Spec last call Martin Duerst

Last message date: Friday, 28 December 2001 11:14:36 UTC