- From: Dan Fraisl <dan@fraisl.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:40:07 -0800
- To: <www-voice@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CEEAIIFANLDLKGHHHDCIMEODCMAA.dan@fraisl.com>
The Open Source Initiative: OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policyunsubscribe -----Original Message----- From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Turner W. Rentz, III Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:46 PM To: www-voice@w3.org Subject: Re: The Open Source Initiative OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy. Even if vigorously defended, a well crafted legal case can show that the exact code of the implementation varies from the patent utility. This case defense has become the norm, and the precedent. Some formats have been patented, such as the case with Compuserves GIF format, however, they have always been superceded by better formats that are not patented. And license fees have been minimal. It is in the best interest of any software company worth its salt to avoid pinning its revenue stream on license revenue generated from patent royalties. It is in the best interests of our working group to avoid topics of conversation that are largely moot. Patents need to be vigoriously defended to remain in effect/defendable.
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 22:38:55 UTC