Wednesday, 29 September 1999
- Re: Bug: at W3C HTML Validation Service
- Re: Bug: at W3C HTML Validation Service
- Re: Bug: at W3C HTML Validation Service
- Re: Bug: at W3C HTML Validation Service
- Re: Bug: at W3C HTML Validation Service
- Re: [PATCH] use CGI.pm;
- Re: [PATCH] use CGI.pm;
- Re: [PATCH] use CGI.pm;
- Bug: at W3C HTML Validation Service
- Re: [PATCH] use CGI.pm;
- RE: Abuse of the W3 Logo
- Re: W3C validator and charset
- RE: Abuse of the W3 Logo
- Re: Abuse of the W3 Logo
- Re: This link seems to crash validator
- RE: Abuse of the W3 Logo
- RE: Abuse of the W3 Logo
- Re: Abuse of the W3 Logo
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
Tuesday, 28 September 1999
- Re: Abuse of the W3 Logo
- Re: Abuse of the W3 Logo
- Re: [PATCH] use CGI.pm;
- Re: Abuse of the W3 Logo
- Abuse of the W3 Logo
- Re: Validator Concerns
- Re: Validator Concerns
- Validator Concerns
Sunday, 26 September 1999
Friday, 24 September 1999
- Re: Why does this validate?
- Re: Why does this validate?
- Why does this validate?
- Re: Flexibility for HTML validator...
- Flexibility for HTML validator...
Thursday, 23 September 1999
Wednesday, 22 September 1999
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- RE: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
Thursday, 23 September 1999
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: Simple Suggestion: Privacy Statement
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
Wednesday, 22 September 1999
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Simple Suggestion: Privacy Statement
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Validator bugs/Improvements
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
Tuesday, 21 September 1999
- OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?
- Re: Java script and validator...
- Java script and validator...
- Re: Problems with & in URIs (Which browsers work)
Monday, 20 September 1999
- Re: Problems with & in URIs (Which browsers work)
- Re: Inefficient validation process
- Re: Inefficient validation process
- Inefficient validation process
- Re: Problems with & in URIs
Sunday, 19 September 1999
Friday, 17 September 1999
- apache & basic auth
- border=0 on results of html 4.0 strict validation (was Re: [www-validator] <none>)
- Re: trivial problem with validator icon html
- Re: Validator produces invalid HTML4 code!
- trivial problem with validator icon html
Wednesday, 15 September 1999
Tuesday, 14 September 1999
- Re: A question/point of interest
- A question/point of interest
- ALT-Texts in Outline
- patch for /check/referer
- Re: This link seems to crash validator
- Re: HTML 4 Validator Problem?
- Re: Validator produces invalid HTML4 code!
- Re: This link seems to crash validator
Monday, 13 September 1999
Sunday, 12 September 1999
Saturday, 11 September 1999
- one error left - is it possible to reach XHTML1.0?
- HTML 4 Validator Problem?
- Re: FW: A new question for the RDF FAQ
- FW: A new question for the RDF FAQ
- Re: [PATCH] XHTML Outline Fix
Friday, 10 September 1999
- Re: new validator behavoir with character references
- Re: [PATCH] XHTML Outline Fix
- new validator behavoir with character references
- Re: [PATCH] XHTML Outline Fix
- Re: bug report
- Link Checker
- Re: bug report
- [PATCH] XHTML Outline Fix
Thursday, 9 September 1999
Wednesday, 8 September 1999
Tuesday, 7 September 1999
- Re: /check/referer should redirect
- Re: [Q] Anyone using path info?
- Re: The validator and XML standalone tags
- Re: The validator and XML standalone tags
- Re: Installing the validator on my website
- Re: [Q] Anyone using path info?
- Re: /check/referer should redirect
- Re: [PATCH] Misc. minor fixes
- Re: /check/referer should redirect
- RE: /check/referer should redirect
- RE: Installing the validator on my website
Monday, 6 September 1999
- Re: The validator and XML standalone tags
- Re: The validator and XML standalone tags
- The validator and XML standalone tags
- Installing the validator on my website
- /check/referer should redirect
- Re: [PATCH] Misc. minor fixes
- Re: URI not accepted