- From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 12:31:44 -0400
- To: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
- Cc: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>, Uriel Wittenberg <uw@urielw.com>, www-validator@w3.org
At 06:22 PM 9/22/99 +0200, Terje Bless wrote: >On 22.09.99 at 11:45, Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com> wrote: > >>>Exactly! If you pass one you should pass the other. Anything else is a >bug! >> >>Right, but the layperson has no way of judging that. > >Oh? They just use the same badges; that should be clear enough. :-) No, the point is that the end user has no way of knowing how competent a third part is. There's a reasonable expectation of quality from the W3C -- not necessarily "Joe Validator Writer" (Note nothing in that comment places any value judgement on Liam's work) Ann --- Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials Coming in September --- Mastering XML Founder, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org Director, HWG Online Education http://www.hwg.org/services/classes
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 1999 12:34:18 UTC