- From: Michael Gade <michael@mgade.dk>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 19:47:45 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn@idyllmtn.com>, <www-validator@w3.org>
>Kynn Bartlett wrote: >Well, it can still be valid HTML 3.2 with no doctype <Cite from the HTML 3.2 specs at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html32 > Every conforming HTML 3.2 document must start with the <!DOCTYPE> declaration that is needed to distinguish HTML 3.2 documents from other versions of HTML. --------------- My point was NOT if the document was "correct", but that it claimed to be HTML 4.0. If this kind of abuse is allowed, then people will loose the confidence they should have that W3 can handle the HTML specs. I am not surprised to hear that you can't access it. The W3 validator reports Error 403 Access Denied, when you run it with http://www.genio.dk
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 1999 19:48:43 UTC