- From: Uriel Wittenberg <uw@urielw.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:19:18 -0400
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- CC: www-validator@w3.org
Kynn Bartlett wrote: > At 05:45 p.m. 09/21/99 -0400, Uriel Wittenberg wrote: > >Liam Quinn insists I am entitled to display the W3C "valid HTML" logo > >based on validation at http://www.htmlhelp.com. Is this true? > > Well, is it valid HTML? If so, then it shouldn't really matter, should > it? > You mean, if I know it's valid I can display the W3C logo without bothering with the validators? -- http://www.urielw.com/
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 1999 00:19:52 UTC