Anne van Kesteren
- Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-06-24
- Re: question about XML and HTML5
- Re: question about XML and HTML5
- Re: question about XML and HTML5
- Re: sandboxed iframes
- Re: Disambiguating @summary from a long descriptor
- <canvas> test 008.html buggy
- Re: <font color="blue"> (was ISSUE-32)
- XMLHttpRequest spec
- draft-abarth-mime-sniff and fonts
Asser Nilsson
Bijan Parsia
- Re: HTML WG process
- RE: FW: [Bug 7034] New: change "conformance checker" to "ideology checker" or "loyalty checker"
Boris Zbarsky
- Re: Disambiguating @summary from a long descriptor
- Re: Disambiguating @summary from a long descriptor
Chris Lilley
- Re: Errata for PNG spec (tRNS chunk)
- Fwd: Errata for PNG spec (tRNS chunk)
- TimBL 91 status in SVG
- test, please ignore
Dailey, David P.
Dan Connolly
Danny Ayers
- twitter from the seat
- Re: Request to Strengthen the HTML5 Accessibility Design Principle
- angel
- and my dog
- the time is nigh
- publishing binary media online not easy
- Fwd: [GANDI] 1 domain(s) expiring in 30 days
- from a friend in Derby
David Duce
David Poehlman
Doug Schepers
Edward O'Connor
fantasai
Geoffrey Sneddon
Giovanni Campagna
glennrp@comcast.net
Henri Sivonen
Ian Hickson
- Re: Request to Strengthen the HTML5 Accessibility Design Principle
- Re: Request to Strengthen the HTML5 Accessibility Design Principle
- Re: Web addresses feedback
- Web addresses feedback
- Re: PF Response: @Summary
- Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies" (ACTION-123)
James Graham
Janina Sajka
- WAI-CG Consensus Recommendations on Alternative Text in HTML 5
- PF Response: @Summary
- Re: table summary
jgraham@opera.com
John Foliot
- RE: Disambiguating @summary from a long descriptor
- RE: Disambiguating @summary from a long descriptor
- RE: PF Response: @Summary
- RE: PF Response: @Summary
- RE: PF Response: @Summary
Jonas Sicking
- Re: Does anyone like microdata?
- Re: Does anyone like microdata?
- Re: PF Response: @Summary
- Re: PF Response: @Summary
- Re: Why Design Principles?
Jonathan Rees
- Re: question about XML and HTML5
- Re: question about XML and HTML5
- Re: question about XML and HTML5
- question about XML and HTML5
- Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05
Joonas Linde
Joshue O Connor
- Re: Disambiguating @summary from a long descriptor
- Re: Disambiguating @summary from a long descriptor
- Disambiguating @summary from a long descriptor
- Re: PF Response: @Summary
- Re: table summary
Julian Reschke
L. David Baron
- transition test for www-style message
- Re: Spelling changes
- Re: Spelling changes
- Re: Spelling changes
- Spelling changes
- Re: Spelling changes
Larry Masinter
- HTML WG process
- RE: FW: [Bug 7034] New: change "conformance checker" to "ideology checker" or "loyalty checker"
- RE: FW: [Bug 7034] New: change "conformance checker" to "ideology checker" or "loyalty checker"
- RE: FW: [Bug 7034] New: change "conformance checker" to "ideology checker" or "loyalty checker"
- FW: [Bug 7034] New: change "conformance checker" to "ideology checker" or "loyalty checker"
Laura Carlson
- Re: PF Response: @Summary
- Re: PF Response: @Summary
- Re: table summary
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- table summary
Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: Disambiguating @summary from a long descriptor
- Re: Disambiguating @summary from a long descriptor
- Re: A generalized <summary> element
- A generalized <summary> element
- Re: PF Response: @Summary
- Re: PF Response: @Summary
- Re: PF Response: @Summary
- Re: Why Design Principles?
- Re: Why Design Principles?
Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Does anyone like microdata?
- Re: Why Design Principles?
- Re: Why Design Principles?
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
Michael(tm) Smith
- Re: HTML WG - editing vs. affecting change [was: evidence of harm]
- Re: evidence of harm
- HTML WG - editing vs. affecting change [was: evidence of harm]
- Re: evidence of harm
- Re: FW: [Bug 7034] New: change "conformance checker" to "ideology checker" or "loyalty checker"
- Re: FW: [Bug 7034] New: change "conformance checker" to "ideology checker" or "loyalty checker"
Noah Slater
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Renato Iannella
Rob Sayre
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
Sam Ruby
- Re: evidence of harm
- Re: evidence of harm
- Re: Request to Strengthen the HTML5 Accessibility Design Principle
- Re: consensus and last call
- Re: Request to Strengthen the HTML5 Accessibility Design Principle
- Re: consensus and last call
- Re: question about XML and HTML5
- Re: Why Design Principles?
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
- Re: Design Principles, Section 1.6.1 relationship to HTML 4.01
Sean B. Palmer
Shelley Powers
- Re: Does anyone like microdata?
- Re: Does anyone like microdata?
- Re: HTML WG - editing vs. affecting change [was: evidence of harm]
- Re: evidence of harm
- Summary of Thursday's IRC conversation about @summar
Steven Faulkner
- Re: evidence of harm
- evidence of harm
- Re: consensus and last call
- Re: consensus and last call
- consensus and last call