- From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:55:14 +1000
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, Brian Suda <brian.suda@gmail.com>
- CC: <www-archive@w3.org>, "Martin Hepp (UniBW)" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
Hi all....I am a bit behind in the merge of the two RDF/vcard documents.....but have a few questions: 1 - do we need the "v" namespace prefixes (in all the formal Ontology Reference) for all the properties and classes? (since you can use any prefix you like....) 2 - There is a missing property: PRODID - the id of the vCard creator (ie a software product) ? 3 - vCard does not specify the longitude and latitude properties (only GEO) and we do ? 4 - We define mobileTel property but vCard calls this "cell" ? 5 - We define a mobileEmail and personalEmail and workEmail properties, but there is no such semantics in vCard? 6 - I am not clear on the unlabeledAdr, unlabeledEmail, and unlabeledTel properties we define? Are these to capture all the "old" types in vCard like bbs-tel, parcel-adr etc? And, of course, we don't capture these as rdf properties in our ontology? 7 - How to do handle vCard's preferred type? Ie I prefer my workTel over my homeTel? 8 - I assume we don't wish to support Bag, Seq, Alt anymore.....but just support rdf:list? Cheers... Renato Iannella NICTA
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 03:12:41 UTC