- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:23:28 -0400
- To: Rob Sayre <rsayre@mozilla.com>
- CC: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Rob Sayre wrote: > On 6/1/09 7:01 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> From my point of view, a push to publish a Design Principles document >> as a formal W3C Note is a distraction. To be clear, I am not saying >> that the Design Principles document itself isn't useful and >> interesting, but the effort to publish it as a Note means that the >> details of the wording is something that must be discussed. > > There seem to be group members laboring under the assumption that the > Design Principles document does not apply to their suggestions or > objections. It is a common debating technique to make grandiose claims without specifics. > I would like to put that two year old distraction to rest. As would we all. > There may be wiggle room in some of the points, but that's not > concerning. Agreed. > My view is that suggestions and objections that violate the > Design Principles document in obvious ways will not be taken seriously > by browser vendors. Agreed. Now: what was your point? > - Rob - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 17:24:13 UTC