W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > June 2009

Re: <font color="blue"> (was ISSUE-32)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:18:46 +0200
To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: "Web Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uu7i9k0364w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook.local>

On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:10:31 +0200, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>  
> Meanwhile, there exists a proposal to make summary attribute conforming.
> Not mandatory or anything, simply optional:
>    http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/SummaryForTABLE/SummarySpecification
> Looking at "version a" in that proposal, the only operational
> requirement I see on existing browsers is contained on the last line:
>    The summary DOM attribute must reflect the summary content attribute.
> As far as I can tell, that particular requirement is both redundant and
> not in dispute.  I say redundant in that HTML5 specifies that all
> unrecognized attributes, "vestigial" or otherwise, are to be placed in
> the DOM.  And I know of no existing browsers or plans to do otherwise.

I think you misunderstand DOM attributes. Having said that, I doubt any  
browser does not support the summary DOM attribute.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 13:19:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:33:40 UTC