Charlton Barreto
- Correction: Reissue of Proposal on wsdl 1.1 and wsdl 2.0 MEPs
- Reissue of Proposal on wsdl 1.1 and wsdl 2.0 MEPs
- Reissue of Proposal on BP 1.1
- Proposal on BP 1.1 (along with SSBP 1.0 and AP 1.0)
- Proposal on WSDL 11 vs. WSDL 2.0 MEPs
Chiusano Joseph
Furniss, Peter
- RE: CDL collision resolution
- optional messages and indeterminate sequences of messages
- RE: Coordination and choreography
- Coordination and choreography
- CDL collision resolution
- RE: Composition example
- RE: Composition example
Gary Brown
- Re: Issue 742 - Proposal for discussion
- Re: Composition example
- Re: Composition example
- Re: Issue 742 - Proposal for discussion
- Re: Issue 742 - Proposal for discussion
- Re: Issue 742 - Proposal for discussion
- Composition example
- another test
- ISSUE: Minor renaming on interaction exchange type field
Greg Ritzinger
Hao.He@thomson.com
Haugen Robert
Jeff Mischkinsky
Martin Chapman
- RE: sep 22 editor's copy
- RE: Import/Include - a proposal
- RE: Import/Include - a proposal
- RE: Import/Include - a proposal
- FW: Proposal on WSDL 1.1 vs WSDL 2.0 MEPs
- FW: Proposal on BP 1.1 (along with SSBP 1.0 and AP 1.0)
- FW: Proposal on WSDL 1.1 vs WSDL 2.0 MEPs
- FW: Proposal on BP 1.1 (along with SSBP 1.0 and AP 1.0)
- FW: Proposal on WSDL 1.1 vs WSDL 2.0 MEPs
Monica J. Martin
Monika Solanki
- Re: Different composition(or invocation) order may result an undesirable Feature Interaction problem in Web service
- granularity/definition of a "service"
Nickolas Kavantzas
- Re: Revised version of the language specification
- Re: Issue 742 - Proposal for discussion
- Re: Issue 742 - Proposal for discussion
- Re: Issue 742 - Proposal for discussion
- Re: Import/Include - a proposal
- Issue 868 -WSCDL-- (assign with many copy elements within it)
- Issue ? -WSCDL-- (marking silent actions and absence of work)
- Issue ? -WSCDL-- (ws-cdl function extensions additions related to channels)
- Issue ? -WSCDL-- (ws-cdl function extensions changes related to time)
- Issue ? (catch all does not exist for an exception) - Proposal for discussion
- Issue 742 - Proposal for discussion
- Issue 783 - Proposal for discussion
- Simple suggestions for issues, issues proposals format
- Re: ISSUE: Minor renaming on interaction exchange type field
rayluo
- RE: Different composition(or invocation) order may result an undesirable Feature Interaction problem in Web service
- Different composition(or invocation) order may result an undesirable Feature Interaction problem in Web service
Steve Ross-Talbot
- Re: Different composition(or invocation) order may result an undesirable Feature Interaction problem in Web service
- Requirements and critical success factors
- Steve's comments on WS-CDL 22nd Sept Draft
- Re: Import/Include - a proposal
- For discussion on tonight's agenda (WSDL and Interacts)
- Re: Composition example
- Re: Composition example
- test