bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
- [Bug 18380] New: Add reference to "Web Applications Privacy Best Practices"
- [Bug 17804] Handling parameter part of type attribute on the draft
- [Bug 15724] Clarify which sections of the draft API are normative vs. non-normative
- [Bug 17804] New: Handling parameter part of type attribute on the draft
- [Bug 17792] The draft says Intent Markup's type attribute must be space-separated but examples are comma-separated
- [Bug 17792] New: The draft says Intent Markup's type attribute must be space-separated but examples are comma-separated
- [Bug 17737] New: Flesh out the error cases for the error callback of startActivity
Cathy.Chan@nokia.com
- Some comments and questions on Web Intents draft
- RE: Review of Web Intents addendum for local services
- RE: Review of Web Intents addendum for local services
- Review of Web Intents addendum for local services
cheng zheng
Deepanshu Gautam
FABLET Youenn
Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
- Re: Explicit intents privacy concern
- reference addition for WebIntents draft
- Re: Comments/Questions on WebIntents editors draft 19 June
- Re: SV: Web Intents UPnP Local services addendum comments
- Web Intents UPnP Local services addendum comments
- Comments/Questions on WebIntents editors draft 19 June
Greg Billock
- Re: Local Discovery addendum update for mDNS
- Paging Robin...
- Re: Explicit intents privacy concern
- Re: Explicit intents privacy concern
- Re: Explicit intents privacy concern
- Re: Explicit intents privacy concern
- Explicit intents privacy concern
- Re: Some comments and questions on Web Intents draft
- Re: reference addition for WebIntents draft
- Re: question on 4.1 explicit intents
- Re: Some comments and questions on Web Intents draft
- Wiki page on editing the draft spec
- Re: Comments/Questions on WebIntents editors draft 19 June
- Re: possibly additional requirement for web intents
Ian Hickson
James Hawkins
- Re: Local Discovery addendum update for mDNS
- Re: reference addition for WebIntents draft
- Re: A suggestion to add a new attribute to the <intent> registration markup
- Re: A suggestion to add a new attribute to the <intent> registration markup
- Re: possibly additional requirement for web intents
- Re: Comments/Questions on WebIntents editors draft 19 June
Jean-Claude Dufourd
- Re: possibly additional requirement for web intents
- Re: rewrite of section 4
- Re: question on 4.1 explicit intents
- Re: rewrite of section 4
- Re: possibly additional requirement for web intents
- Re: possibly additional requirement for web intents
- possibly additional requirement for web intents
- Re: Comments/Questions on WebIntents editors draft 19 June
- Re: Web Intents Addendum for local Services uploaded
John Lyle
Josh Soref
Jungkee Song
Marcos Caceres
Nilsson, Claes1
- New version of Web Intents Addendum - Local Services uploaded
- RE: Web Intents Addendum for local Services uploaded
- RE: Web Intents Addendum for local Services uploaded
- SV: SV: Web Intents UPnP Local services addendum comments
- SV: Web Intents UPnP Local services addendum comments
- RE: Review of Web Intents addendum for local services
- RE: Review of Web Intents addendum for local services
Norifumi Kikkawa
- Re: Local Discovery addendum update for mDNS
- Local Discovery addendum update for mDNS
- Re: Review of Web Intents addendum for local services
- Re: Review of Web Intents addendum for local services
Paul Kinlan
- Re: Local Discovery addendum update for mDNS
- Re: Local Discovery addendum update for mDNS
- Re: Explicit intents privacy concern