- From: Nilsson, Claes1 <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:34:27 +0200
- To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>, Jean-Claude Dufourd <jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr>
- CC: "public-web-intents@w3.org" <public-web-intents@w3.org>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi Bryan, If I understand you correctly I see this use case covered by the proposal specification. In this case the intents-enabled media gateway has the role of Web Intents enabled UPnP device as well as a UPnP control point for legacy UPnP devices. Regards Claes >-----Original Message----- >From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L [mailto:bs3131@att.com] >Sent: den 11 juli 2012 13:24 >To: Nilsson, Claes1; Jean-Claude Dufourd >Cc: public-web-intents@w3.org; public-device-apis@w3.org >Subject: RE: Web Intents Addendum for local Services uploaded > >Claes, > >Would the deployment case of an intents-enabled media gateway (acting as >a bridge for discovery and access to content on non-intents-capable >devices in the local network) be covered by the initial scope you have >addressed? i.e. saying nothing about how such a device might act as a >bridge, is the case covered in which a UPnP-enabled device, via Web >Intents, references or somehow delivers content that resides on some >other device so that the client can access it? > >Thanks, >Bryan Sullivan >________________________________ >From: Nilsson, Claes1 [Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com] >Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 2:27 AM >To: Jean-Claude Dufourd >Cc: public-web-intents@w3.org; public-device-apis@w3.org >Subject: RE: Web Intents Addendum for local Services uploaded > >Hi Jean-Claude, > >I agree that connection of Web Intents with unmodified, non Web Intents >enabled devices, is also interesting. There are advantages and >disadvantages with both approaches. However, as stated before, we have >started to work on a specification with the clear assumption "Web >Intents enabled local devices". The statement "A Web Intents enabled >UPnP device MUST ..." is therefore correct as it says what is required >from a Web Intents enabled UPnP devices. The statement does not say >anything about or exclude Web Intents for non Web Intents enabled UPnP >devices. > >I hope to get bandwith after the summer to look at Web Intents for >services on non Web Intents enabled local devices. This includes not >only UPnP and mDNS devices but also Bluetooth, USB, ANT+ etc connected >devices. > >Best regards > Claes > >From: Jean-Claude Dufourd [mailto:jean-claude.dufourd@telecom- >paristech.fr] >Sent: den 11 juli 2012 10:28 >To: Nilsson, Claes1 >Cc: public-web-intents@w3.org; public-device-apis@w3.org >Subject: Re: Web Intents Addendum for local Services uploaded > >Your addendum describes a connection of web intents to modified UPnP >devices and services. >I claim that it is perfectly possible, and preferrable, to connect web >intents with unmodified UPnP devices and services. > >I remember, Claes, when you said that the two are not incompatible. >I hope you are right, but I am not so sure. > >I actually object to the "A Web Intents enabled UPnP device MUST ..." >sentences, because they carry the implication that only those UPnP >devices can work with web intents, that only modified UPnP devices can >and unmodified UPnP devices will not. >And that is not true, according to me. > >I am not sure exactly what change would make the addendum acceptable to >me, but that seems to be the most sensitive issue. >Best regards >JC > >On 27juin 23:32, Nilsson, Claes1 wrote: >Hi, > >I have uploaded the draft Web Intents Addendum specification on Local >Services, http://w3c-test.org/dap/wi-addendum-local-services/. > >In addition there is a video of a demo of the use case "Play video on >remote device using Web Intents", https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B- >2pb_m94nPxRGV5LTRvM0pLaUU/edit. > >Feedback is welcome! > >Best regards > Claes >[cid:3333625383_1036728] > >Claes Nilsson M.Sc.E.E >Master Engineer, Research >Technology Research - Advanced Application Lab > >Sony Mobile Communications > Phone: +46 10 80 15178 >Mobile: +46 705 56 68 78 >Switchboard: +46 10 80 00000 >E-Mail: >mailto:claes1.nilsson@sonymobile.com<mailto:claes1.nilsson@sonyericsson. >com> >Visiting Address; Nya Vattentornet >SE-221 88 LUND, >Sweden >Disclaimer: >The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >privileged. It is intended solely for the named recipient(s) and access >to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. The views are those of >the sender and not necessarily the views of Sony Ericsson and Sony >Ericsson accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever or howsoever >arising in connection with this e-mail.Any attachment(s) to this message >has been checked for viruses, but please rely on your own virus checker >and procedures. If you contact us by e-mail, we will store your name and >address to facilitate communications. If you are not the intended >recipient, please inform the sender by replying this transmission and >delete the e-mail and any copies of it without disclosing it. > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2012 13:35:03 UTC