Re: Comments/Questions on WebIntents editors draft 19 June

On 11/7/12 19:14 , James Hawkins wrote:
>
>     (9) Do not explicit intents open a hole in the user-control of
>     intents?
>
>     This sounds potentially serious. Perhaps more discussion is needed
>     here.
>
>
> Per discussion at the F2F, the addition of a speed bump (the answer of 
> which is sticky) should solve this issue.  I'll make sure we get that 
> text added to the spec.
>
JCD: What do you mean with "speed bump (the answer of which is sticky)" ?
Thanks
JC

-- 
JC Dufourd
Directeur d'Etudes/Professor
Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group
Traitement du Signal et Images/Signal and Image Processing
Telecom ParisTech, 37-39 rue Dareau, 75014 Paris, France
Tel: +33145817733 - Mob: +33677843843 - Fax: +33145817144