public-sml@w3.org from August 2007 by date

Thursday, 30 August 2007

• [Bug 4941] support for references pointing to elements other than root elements should be optional bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4629] Relationship between SML and XPath 2.0 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4630] Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4628] Relationship between SML and schema 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4686] Review proposed text changes Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
• [Bug 4686] Use schema terminorlogies to describe "xml schema valid" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 29 August 2007

• [Bug 4995] Scoping of sml identity constraints (key, keyref, unique) bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4884] update the definition of a null reference to include the unimplemented-schemes case bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4994] Portable interpretation of "locator" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4884] update the definition of a null reference to include the unimplemented-schemes case bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4993] Remove the concept of "empty" and "dangling" references bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4780] Correct section 3.4 targetRequired such that targetRequired=true is not violated for empty or null references. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4795] Update 3.4.2.2 so that its not enforce on empty or null reference elements bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 28 August 2007

• Regrets for Toronto F2F Zulah Eckert
• [Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4739] 5.1.3 smlerr output element node serialization bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4686] Use schema terminorlogies to describe "xml schema valid" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4686] Use schema terminorlogies to describe "xml schema valid" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4686] Use schema terminorlogies to describe "xml schema valid" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4684] Can sml:keyref refer to an xs:key/unique? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4684] Can sml:keyref refer to an xs:key/unique? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4676] why we did not use sml:reftype in documentURI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4658] How should deref() treat multiple child elements that use the same reference scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4657] Restrict the use of deref in sml:field/@xpath for SML implementation built on top of relational databases bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• dial-in information for Toronto ftf meeting 28-30 August 2007 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• [Bug 4743] clarify SMLIF section 1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4743] clarify SMLIF section 1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4743] clarify SMLIF section 1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4647] smlerr:output - why exclude node sets including text nodes, PIs, comments, ... ? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4617] SML Schema: The refer attribute in sml:keyref should be optional bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4652] Should SML-IF be described at the octet level or the infoset level? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4743] clarify SMLIF section 1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4781] Make sml:uri tag have plain URI and do the same in the EPR example in the address tag. removing EPR reference parameters. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4781] Make sml:uri tag have plain URI and do the same in the EPR example in the address tag. removing EPR reference parameters. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4783] Change section 3.2.1.4 to handle cases for invalid values of sml:ref=\"\" including \"false\". bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4783] Change section 3.2.1.4 to handle cases for invalid values of sml:ref=\"\" including \"false\". bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4781] Make sml:uri tag have plain URI and do the same in the EPR example in the address tag. removing EPR reference parameters. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4658] How should deref() treat multiple child elements that use the same reference scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: triage candidates Smith, Virginia (HP Software)

Monday, 27 August 2007

• [Bug 4988] Incorrect reference to schema part 2 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: [w3c sml] [4775] Change "skip" to "lax" processing Sandy Gao

Saturday, 25 August 2007

• RE: [4774] Schema binding issue description - please review usecases Valentina Popescu
• [4774] Schema binding issue - proposal Valentina Popescu

Friday, 24 August 2007

• [w3c sml] On recognizing, handling, and constraining SML references Sandy Gao
• Fw: [w3c sml] Schema 1.1 slides Sandy Gao
• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2007-08-23 SML Teleconference Zulah Eckert
• [w3c sml] Schema 1.1 slides Sandy Gao
• RE: [4774] Schema binding issue description - please review usecases Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
• RE: [w3c sml] Action 108 - tracking bugs Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
• [w3c sml] [4684] sml:keyref reference to xs:key/unique Wilson, Kirk D
• triage candidates John Arwe
• RE: [w3c sml] Action 108 - tracking bugs John Arwe
• RE: [w3c sml] Action 108 - tracking bugs Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
• RE: [w3c sml] Action 108 - tracking bugs Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
• Fw: [w3c sml] Action 108 - tracking bugs John Arwe
• Re: [w3c sml] Action 108 - tracking bugs John Arwe
• Re: [w3c sml] [4775] Change "skip" to "lax" processing John Arwe
• [w3c sml] [4775] Change "skip" to "lax" processing Wilson, Kirk D
• [w3c sml] [4637] Construction of EPR Reference Scheme Wilson, Kirk D
• RE: [4774] Schema binding issue description - please review usecases Valentina Popescu
• RE: [4774] Schema binding issue description - please review usecases Smith, Virginia (HP Software)

Thursday, 23 August 2007

• [4774] Schema binding issue description - please review usecases Valentina Popescu
• 2007-07-26 SML Teleconference minutes question John Arwe
• [Bug 4743] clarify SMLIF section 1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: [w3c sml] [agenda] 2007-08-23 SML Teleconference John Arwe
• RE: [w3c sml] [agenda] 2007-08-23 SML Teleconference Wilson, Kirk D
• [Bug 4691] Clarify that sch:rule/@context expression can't use deref() function bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4618] Fix sch:rule samples to comply with the Schematron specification bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4651] Definition of 'consumer' needs clarification bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: [w3c sml] [4618] please review Pratul Dublish
• [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4977] Schematron queryBinding attribute bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [w3c sml] [4618] please review Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
• [Bug 4618] Fix sch:rule samples to comply with the Schematron specification bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 22 August 2007

• [4795] target required and null/empty/dangling references John Arwe
• [Bug 4976] Is "multiple targets" a reference error? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [w3c sml] [4774] Schema binding issue description Sandy Gao

Tuesday, 21 August 2007

• Fw: [w3c sml] [agenda] 2007-08-23 SML Teleconference John Arwe

Friday, 17 August 2007

• [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-08-28 SML Toronto F2F Pratul Dublish
• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2007-08-16 SML Teleconference Smith, Virginia (HP Software)

Thursday, 16 August 2007

• [Bug 4827] Implementation of SML identity constraints that use the smlfn:deref() function in sml:field. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4657] Restrict the use of deref in sml:field/@xpath for SML implementation built on top of relational databases bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4656] Restrict XPointer for SML implementations on top of relational databases? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4826] Implementation of references that target non-root elements. Xpointer support in general. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4823] In 3.3.6, Replace: If neither of these cases applies, the inter-document reference is to a document not included in the interchange set. Such a reference is called \"an unresolved inter-document reference.\" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4823] In 3.3.6, Replace: If neither of these cases applies, the inter-document reference is to a document not included in the interchange set. Such a reference is called \"an unresolved inter-document reference.\" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4807] Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can make them more clear bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4803] Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an instance by evaluation the rule elements...) to refer to the schematron spec bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4802] For bullet points 4,5 (...XPath expression must conform to...) we should remove the BNF and refer to the Schema spec section instead and add that the xpath expression can also include the deref() function bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4801] Think about making wording of bullet point 3 (if an SML identity constraint is specified for an element dec. E, then this constraint is applicable...) to be more crisp about the scope bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4795] Update 3.4.2.2 so that its not enforce on empty or null reference elements bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 15 August 2007

• [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-08-16 SML Pratul Dublish

Thursday, 9 August 2007

• [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-08-02 SML Teleconference Jordan Boucher

Friday, 10 August 2007

• [Bug 4941] support for references pointing to elements other than root elements should be optional bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4682] Attribute based reference schemes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Thursday, 9 August 2007

• [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4652] Should SML-IF be described at the octet level or the infoset level? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4666] Should SML IF specify any minimum requirements for the encoding used in SML IF documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: Regrets for 8/9/07 teleconference Lipton, Paul C
• Regrets for 8/9/07 teleconference Zulah Eckert

Wednesday, 8 August 2007

• [w3c sml] [agenda] 2007-08-09 SML Teleconference Pratul Dublish
• [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-08-02 SML Teleconference Jordan Boucher

Tuesday, 7 August 2007

• Regrets for 2008-08-09 Teleconference Brian You

Saturday, 4 August 2007

• [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-08-02 SML Teleconference Jordan Boucher
• [Bug 4914] editorial changes suggested by webmaster bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4914] editorial changes suggested by webmaster bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Friday, 3 August 2007

• RE: [w3c sml] Bugzilla Issue: 4639 - Cyclic SML models Wilson, Kirk D
• RE: [w3c sml] Bugzilla Issue: 4639 - Cyclic SML models Wilson, Kirk D
• RE: [w3c sml] Bugzilla Issue: 4639 - Cyclic SML models Pratul Dublish
• RE: [w3c sml] Bugzilla Issue: 4639 - Cyclic SML models Wilson, Kirk D
• [Bug 4691] Clarify that sch:rule/@context expression can't use deref() function bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Thursday, 2 August 2007

• [Bug 4652] Should SML-IF be described at the octet level or the infoset level? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4651] Definition of 'consumer' needs clarification bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4647] smlerr:output - why exclude node sets including text nodes, PIs, comments, ... ? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4643] inheritance of identity constraints through substitution - align with XSD? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4630] Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4629] Relationship between SML and XPath 2.0 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4628] Relationship between SML and schema 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: [w3c sml] [agenda] 2007-08-02 SML Teleconference Lipton, Paul C
• RE: [w3c sml] [agenda] 2007-08-02 SML Teleconference Waschke, Marvin G
• RE: [w3c sml] [agenda] 2007-08-02 SML Teleconference Zulah Eckert
• [Bug 4906] In 3.4, don't write deref() function into the BNF bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4906] In 3.4, don't write deref() function into the BNF bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 1 August 2007

• issue 4636 What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers? C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• [Bug 4906] In 3.4, don't write deref() function into the BNF bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: [w3c sml] [agenda] 2007-08-02 SML Teleconference Wilson, Kirk D
• [w3c sml] [agenda] 2007-08-02 SML Teleconference Pratul Dublish
• [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-07-26 SML Teleconference Kumar Pandit

Last message date: Thursday, 30 August 2007 17:32:04 UTC