- From: Wilson, Kirk D <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:49:36 -0400
- To: <public-sml@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <F9576E62032243419E097FED5F0E75F3032760BD@USILMS12.ca.com>
All, The email will serve to initiate the discussion of whether we should specify processControl="lax" rather than the current "skip" for wildcards in the SML XML Schemas. There is only one occurrence of processControl="skip" in the SML specification: for the content of the smlerr:errorDataType. The original issue was raised with respect SML-IF in which processControl="skip" is used for all extension elements (both xs:any and xs:anyAttribute) in the type definitions of this specification. Since I wasn't involved in the original authorship of the spec, I'm not sure what the rationale was for the original use of "skip". I assume it was for efficiency of the SML-IF consumer, the assumption being that the SML-IF would need to concern itself only with sml elements according to the semantics specified in SML-IF. In my notes I have found the following definition of an SML-IF consumer: "processes SML-IF documents in whole or in part by the semantics of this specification" (emphasis added). Since, by definition, extension elements lie beyond the semantics of the spec, there appears to be no reason for the processor's attempting to validate the extension elements. But I would consider this a poor argument. "Skip" seems too finalistic and may not meet the requirements of SML-IF consumer creators and SML-IF document authors who need to build in special information, eg., into the ModelType, and can provide the schema for validation (assessment). I suspect that something like this rationale underlies what appears to be the industry "best practice" of using "lax" processing. The cost of using lax processing is undoubtedly absolutely minimal. I will recommend changing the spec to "lax", according to what is industry best practice. Kirk Wilson, Ph.D. CA Inc. Research Staff Member, CA Labs Intellectual Property and Standards Council of Technical Excellence W3C Advisory Committee Representative Tele: + 1 603 823-7146 Fax: + 1 603 823-7148 <mailto:kirk.wilson@ca.com>
Received on Friday, 24 August 2007 14:50:31 UTC