public-shacl@w3.org from June 2020 by author

Andy Seaborne

• Re: SHACL and SHACLC mime types (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: HTTP requests, databases and how to transmit SHACL validation reports (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: HTTP requests, databases and how to transmit SHACL validation reports (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: sh:in is closed vs sh:hasValue is open (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: HTTP requests, databases and how to transmit SHACL validation reports (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: SHACL and SHACLC mime types (Monday, 1 June)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: SHACL target extension (Thursday, 11 June)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: SHACL target extension (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: multiple matching shapes and sh:closed (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: SHACL and SHACLC mime types (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: SHACL and SHACLC mime types (Monday, 1 June)

Håvard M. Ottestad

• Re: HTTP requests, databases and how to transmit SHACL validation reports (Thursday, 4 June)

Håvard Ottestad

• Re: HTTP requests, databases and how to transmit SHACL validation reports (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Re: HTTP requests, databases and how to transmit SHACL validation reports (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Friday, 5 June)

Irene Polikoff

• The many shapes of SHACL event (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Open list alternative of sh:in? (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: multiple matching shapes and sh:closed (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: sh:in is closed vs sh:hasValue is open (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: sh:in is closed vs sh:hasValue is open (Thursday, 4 June)

Lars G. Svensson

• Aw: Re: Re: SHACL and SHACLC mime types (Friday, 5 June)
• Aw: Re: SHACL and SHACLC mime types (Friday, 5 June)

lars.svensson@web.de

• Aw: Re: HTTP requests, databases and how to transmit SHACL validation reports (Friday, 5 June)

Nicholas Car

• Re: SHACL and SHACLC mime types (Friday, 19 June)

Paul Hermans

• Use of SHACL in e-government context (Monday, 8 June)

Radostin Nanov

• Open list alternative of sh:in? (Thursday, 4 June)

Vladimir Alexiev

• Re: SHACL and SHACLC mime types (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: HTTP requests, databases and how to transmit SHACL validation reports (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Re: SHACL and SHACLC mime types (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: multiple matching shapes and sh:closed (Thursday, 4 June)
• multiple matching shapes and sh:closed (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: sh:in is closed vs sh:hasValue is open (Thursday, 4 June)
• sh:in is closed vs sh:hasValue is open (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: SHACL target extension (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: SHACL and SHACLC mime types (Tuesday, 2 June)
• SHACL and SHACLC mime types (Monday, 1 June)

Last message date: Friday, 19 June 2020 09:46:55 UTC