- From: Lars G. Svensson <lars.svensson@web.de>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 07:56:16 +0200
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: public-shacl@w3.org, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, Herbert Van de Sompel <hvdsomp@gmail.com>
Hi Holger, Vladimir, On Montag, 01. Juni 2020 um 11:46 Uhr, "Holger Knublauch" <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote: > Regarding the specific mime type question, text/shaclc with .shaclc sounds good to me. > I don't really think the others need specific mime types as there is no such things as > a pure SHACL Turtle file IMHO. It's usually SHACL mixed with some parts of RDFS and > other properties such as rdfs:comment. +1 to that! Except perhaps for shaclc, a SHACL document has one of the RDF media types (Turtle, RDF/XML etc.). The fact that it contains information about shapes or a SHACL validation report is orthogonal to that. This is what the profiles work in the Data Exchange WG shall solve [1]. As suggested in another thread [2], it would be great if the SHACL CG would publish profile URIs for SHACL documents (or rather documents containing -- among other triples -- shapes defined in SHACL) and SHACL validation reports. [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/dx-prof-conneg/ [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-shacl/2020Jun/0019.html Best, Lars
Received on Friday, 5 June 2020 05:56:36 UTC