- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 10:01:22 +0100
- To: public-shacl@w3.org
Would it be work adding ".shc" as another file extension?
".shaclc" is quite long.
It is not in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_filename_extensions_(S%E2%80%93Z)#S
(like almost all 3 letter extensions, it is used for something somewhere)
Andy
On 01/06/2020 09:57, Vladimir Alexiev wrote:
> We're specifying how the Ontotext Platform should interop with SHACL,
> and that includes returning SHACL and SHACLC.
> (I believe that SHACLC is very promising because it's much more
> pleasant to work with than SHACL, and closes one of the competitive
> gaps against SHEX.)
>
> https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl and
> https://w3c.github.io/shacl/shacl-compact-syntax/ don't specify file
> ext and MIME types.
> Here are some proposals:
> - turtle: text/shacl+turtle with file ext: .shacl
> - compact: text/shaclc with file ext .shaclc
> - jsonld: application/shacl+ld+json (is that even valid?)
> - rdf: application/shacl+rdf+xml (is that even valid?)
>
> Holger, could you send a MIME registration request to IANA?
>
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2020 09:01:37 UTC