- From: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 11:57:56 +0300
- To: Public Shacl W3C <public-shacl@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 1 June 2020 08:58:20 UTC
We're specifying how the Ontotext Platform should interop with SHACL, and that includes returning SHACL and SHACLC. (I believe that SHACLC is very promising because it's much more pleasant to work with than SHACL, and closes one of the competitive gaps against SHEX.) https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl and https://w3c.github.io/shacl/shacl-compact-syntax/ don't specify file ext and MIME types. Here are some proposals: - turtle: text/shacl+turtle with file ext: .shacl - compact: text/shaclc with file ext .shaclc - jsonld: application/shacl+ld+json (is that even valid?) - rdf: application/shacl+rdf+xml (is that even valid?) Holger, could you send a MIME registration request to IANA?
Received on Monday, 1 June 2020 08:58:20 UTC