Re: sh:in is closed vs sh:hasValue is open

OK, I must be blind as well :)

Yes, valueIn is fine.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 4, 2020, at 10:08 AM, Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com> wrote:
> 
> > Harvard
> 
> I must be blind. Or maybe confused Havard and Harvard :-)
> >  confusing to have a new constraint component with exactly the same local name. I would prefer having some difference in the name e.g., dash:inOpenList
> 
> But we're proposing a different local name: dash:valueIn. It uses parts of sh:in and sh:hasValue to show the relation.
> Or would you prefer the slightly longer dash:hasValueIn ?