- From: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 20:08:08 +0300
- To: Public Shacl W3C <public-shacl@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2020 17:08:34 UTC
If you look at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-shacl/2020Jun/0005.html, we plan to use more complex targeting than targetClass, eg ex:PoliticianReferenceShape a sh:NodeShape; sh:property [sh:path rdf:type; sh:in (foaf:Person dbo:Person)]; sh:property [sh:path dc:type; sh:hasValue "politician"]; But that's not the point. The point is that if I distribute the props in some meaningful way (eg name, birthDate in shape Person and party, politics in shape Politician), I cannot close either of them because I need to close the union of them. Maybe I can use sh:and, and then sh:closed will look at all props occurring in the different branches of the sh:and and traversing down to sh:path? ex:PoliticianShape a sh:NodeShape; sh:target ex:PoliticianReferenceShape; sh:and ( ex:PersonShape [sh:property [sh:path ex:politics; sh:in ("Democrat" "Republican")]] [sh:property [sh:path ex:party; sh:node ex:PartyReferenceShape]] ); sh:closed true .
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2020 17:08:34 UTC