public-script-coord@w3.org from January to March 2015 by date

Tuesday, 31 March 2015

• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor Simon Pieters

Monday, 30 March 2015

• Re: A new hack for singleton objects Anne van Kesteren
• Re: A new hack for singleton objects Boris Zbarsky
• Re: A new hack for singleton objects Anne van Kesteren

Sunday, 29 March 2015

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Andrea Giammarchi
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Frankie Bagnardi
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Andrea Giammarchi

Friday, 27 March 2015

• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Andrea Giammarchi
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor Simon Pieters

Thursday, 26 March 2015

• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor Robert O'Callahan
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor Simon Pieters
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor Robert O'Callahan
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor Robert O'Callahan
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor Simon Pieters

Wednesday, 25 March 2015

• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor Simon Pieters

Tuesday, 24 March 2015

• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor Elliott Sprehn
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor Boris Zbarsky
• [Bug 28328] New: Bad color contrast for code in note bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20361] Grammar is wrong for serializers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20361] Grammar is wrong for serializers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 23 March 2015

• [Bug 20361] Grammar is wrong for serializers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20361] Grammar is wrong for serializers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 19 March 2015

• [Bug 28244] Requiring @@toStringTag on instances may have performance implications bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 28244] New: Requiring @@toStringTag on instances may have performance implications bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 18 March 2015

• Re: A new hack for singleton objects Boris Zbarsky
• RE: A new hack for singleton objects Domenic Denicola
• Re: A new hack for singleton objects Boris Zbarsky
• Re: A new hack for singleton objects Anne van Kesteren
• Re: A new hack for singleton objects Boris Zbarsky
• RE: A new hack for singleton objects Domenic Denicola

Tuesday, 17 March 2015

• Re: A new hack for singleton objects Boris Zbarsky
• Re: A new hack for singleton objects Olli Pettay
• RE: A new hack for singleton objects Domenic Denicola
• Re: A new hack for singleton objects Anne van Kesteren
• A new hack for singleton objects Domenic Denicola

Thursday, 12 March 2015

• [Bug 26521] [[GetOwnProperty]] behavior for named properties is not web-compatible bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25025] Named creators with [OverrideBuiltins] don't work right as the spec is written now bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Defining a [[Set]] internal method for platform objects Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Creating entangled objects Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 10 March 2015

• Re: Creating entangled objects Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: Creating entangled objects Brendan Eich
• Re: Creating entangled objects Jason Orendorff
• Re: Creating entangled objects Mark S. Miller
• Re: Creating entangled objects Jonas Sicking
• Re: Creating entangled objects Brendan Eich
• Re: Creating entangled objects Mark S. Miller

Monday, 9 March 2015

• Re: Creating entangled objects Jonas Sicking
• Re: Creating entangled objects Mark S. Miller
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? Mark S. Miller
• Re: Creating entangled objects Alex Russell
• Creating entangled objects Mark S. Miller
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? Mark S. Miller
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? Mark S. Miller
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? Tab Atkins Jr.

Friday, 6 March 2015

• Re: Defining a [[Set]] internal method for platform objects Boris Zbarsky

Thursday, 5 March 2015

• RE: Idiomatic representation of { buffer, bytesRead } Domenic Denicola

Wednesday, 4 March 2015

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Alexander Fritze

Tuesday, 3 March 2015

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations John Lenz

Monday, 2 March 2015

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Marius Gundersen

Tuesday, 3 March 2015

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Marius Gundersen

Wednesday, 4 March 2015

• Re: Idiomatic representation of { buffer, bytesRead } Jason Orendorff
• RE: Idiomatic representation of { buffer, bytesRead } Domenic Denicola
• Re: Idiomatic representation of { buffer, bytesRead } Jason Orendorff
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Salvador de la Puente González

Tuesday, 3 March 2015

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Kevin Smith
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? Mark S. Miller
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Tab Atkins Jr.

Monday, 2 March 2015

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Ron Buckton
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Jonas Sicking
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Ron Buckton
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Kevin Smith
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Ron Buckton
• RE: Cancellation architectural observations Domenic Denicola
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Kevin Smith
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Kevin Smith
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Ron Buckton
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Tab Atkins Jr.
• Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? David Dorwin
• Idiomatic representation of { buffer, bytesRead } Domenic Denicola
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Andrea Giammarchi
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Ron Buckton
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Mark Miller
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Andrea Giammarchi
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Dean Tribble
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Kevin Smith
• [Bug 28124] New: Issues in 4.5.11 (Maplike) and 4.5.12 (Setlike) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Cancellation architectural observations Dean Tribble
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations Salvador de la Puente González

Sunday, 1 March 2015

• Re: Cancelable promises Kevin Smith
• RE: Cancelable promises Domenic Denicola
• Re: Cancelable promises Kevin Smith

Saturday, 28 February 2015

• Re: Cancelable promises Salvador de la Puente González

Friday, 27 February 2015

• Re: Cancelable promises Samuel Giles

Saturday, 28 February 2015

• Re: Cancelable promises Benjamin (Inglor) Gruenbaum
• Re: Cancelable promises Frankie Bagnardi
• Re: Cancelable promises Kevin Smith
• RE: Cancelable promises Ron Buckton

Friday, 27 February 2015

• Re: Cancelable promises Jonas Sicking
• Re: Cancelable promises Andrea Giammarchi
• Re: Cancelable promises Kevin Smith
• Cancelable promises Anne van Kesteren

Thursday, 26 February 2015

• RE: Interaction of named properties and own properties in the [OverrideBuiltins] case seems weird Domenic Denicola
• Re: Global method calls Boris Zbarsky
• RE: Global method calls Domenic Denicola
• Re: Interaction of named properties and own properties in the [OverrideBuiltins] case seems weird Boris Zbarsky
• Interaction of named properties and own properties in the [OverrideBuiltins] case seems weird Boris Zbarsky

Monday, 23 February 2015

• Re: Global method calls Boris Zbarsky
• RE: Global method calls Domenic Denicola
• Re: Global method calls Boris Zbarsky

Sunday, 22 February 2015

• Re: Global method calls Brendan Eich
• Re: Global method calls Mark Miller
• RE: Global method calls Domenic Denicola
• Re: Global method calls Mark Miller
• RE: Global method calls Domenic Denicola
• RE: Global method calls Domenic Denicola
• Re: Global method calls Mark Miller
• Global method calls Domenic Denicola

Friday, 20 February 2015

• [Bug 28065] New: WebIDL: Grammar for readonly requires 2 token lookahead in some cases bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 19 February 2015

• [Bug 28057] New: Support Promise subclass bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20019] Support subclassing ES6 Map bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 11 February 2015

• Re: Defining a [[Set]] internal method for platform objects Boris Zbarsky

Tuesday, 10 February 2015

• RE: Defining a [[Set]] internal method for platform objects Domenic Denicola
• Re: Defining a [[Set]] internal method for platform objects Boris Zbarsky
• RE: Defining a [[Set]] internal method for platform objects Domenic Denicola
• [Bug 27995] New: Consider adding some sort of shorthand for resolving a promise with an IDL value bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Getting rid of the separate concepts of setters and creators Boris Zbarsky
• Defining a [[Set]] internal method for platform objects Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Getting rid of the separate concepts of setters and creators Anne van Kesteren
• Getting rid of the separate concepts of setters and creators Boris Zbarsky

Monday, 9 February 2015

• [Bug 25025] Named creators with [OverrideBuiltins] don't work right as the spec is written now bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 26521] [[GetOwnProperty]] behavior for named properties is not web-compatible bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27988] Get rid of the separate concepts of "setters" and "creators" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27988] New: Get rid of the separate concepts of "setters" and "creators" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 26521] [[GetOwnProperty]] behavior for named properties is not web-compatible bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Allow partial enums in return values? Boris Zbarsky
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Saturday, 7 February 2015

• Re: Allow partial enums in return values? Bjoern Hoehrmann

Thursday, 5 February 2015

• Eclipse based Web IDL IDE Rainer Schuster

Wednesday, 4 February 2015

• [Bug 27953] Dictionaries with required properties shouldn't need to be optional bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27953] Dictionaries with required properties shouldn't need to be optional bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27953] New: Dictionaries with required properties shouldn't need to be optional bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 30 January 2015

• Re: classes and enumerability Boris Zbarsky

Thursday, 29 January 2015

• [Bug 22858] use @@hasInstance instead of [[HasInstance]] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22858] use @@hasInstance instead of [[HasInstance]] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22858] use @@hasInstance instead of [[HasInstance]] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22858] use @@hasInstance instead of [[HasInstance]] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22858] use @@hasInstance instead of [[HasInstance]] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 28 January 2015

• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Brendan Eich
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Mark S. Miller
• RE: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Domenic Denicola
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Mark S. Miller
• RE: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Domenic Denicola
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Mark S. Miller
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Mark S. Miller
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Mark S. Miller
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Brendan Eich
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Boris Zbarsky

Tuesday, 27 January 2015

• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Mark S. Miller
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Boris Zbarsky
• [Bug 27905] /I/ in the definition of attribute setter is poorly defined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27906] New: "If validThis is false, then return." bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27905] New: /I/ in the definition of attribute setter is poorly defined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 22 January 2015

• Allow partial enums in return values? Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

Wednesday, 21 January 2015

• [Bug 27874] Microtasks and callbacks run from a queued task bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27874] Microtasks and callbacks run from a queued task bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27874] Microtasks and callbacks run from a queued task bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27874] New: Microtasks and callbacks run from a queued task bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 20 January 2015

• [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Saturday, 17 January 2015

• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 16 January 2015

• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 15 January 2015

• [Bug 27701] Enum should be allowed to end with comma bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Ian Hickson
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Ian Hickson
• [Bug 27317] Provide explicit guidance on enum value naming bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27317] Provide explicit guidance on enum value naming bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Mark S. Miller
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Mark S. Miller
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Yehuda Katz
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Ian Hickson
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Mark S. Miller
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Travis Leithead
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 14 January 2015

• RE: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Domenic Denicola
• RE: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Mark S. Miller
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Olli Pettay
• RE: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Travis Leithead
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Mark S. Miller
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties Ian Hickson
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 13 January 2015

• [Bug 27822] Define the [[Prototype]] of the interface object of an interface whose parent has NoInterfaceObject bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23133] Hook up interface object proto chains as if they were ES6 classes bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27822] New: Define the [[Prototype]] of the interface object of an interface whose parent has NoInterfaceObject bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23133] Hook up interface object proto chains as if they were ES6 classes bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: WebIDL - passing undefined as optional nullable param Boris Zbarsky
• Re: WebIDL - passing undefined as optional nullable param Janusz Majnert
• Re: WebIDL - passing undefined as optional nullable param Anne van Kesteren
• Re: WebIDL - passing undefined as optional nullable param Janusz Majnert
• Re: WebIDL - passing undefined as optional nullable param Anne van Kesteren
• WebIDL - passing undefined as optional nullable param Janusz Majnert
• [Bug 23133] Hook up interface object proto chains as if they were ES6 classes bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23133] Hook up interface object proto chains as if they were ES6 classes bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 9 January 2015

• [Bug 27553] Support Symbol bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 7 January 2015

• [Bug 25312] allow trailing commas on enums bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27701] Enum should be allowed to end with comma bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 6 January 2015

• [Bug 27701] Enum should be allowed to end with comma bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 5 January 2015

• [Bug 27749] "DOMException constructor object" as IDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27749] "DOMException constructor object" as IDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27749] New: "DOMException constructor object" as IDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Saturday, 3 January 2015

• [Bug 27062] DOMException constructor should allow name to be supplied bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27732] New: DOMException lost some constants. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2015 11:55:00 UTC