public-script-coord@w3.org from January to March 2015 by author

Alex Russell

• Re: Creating entangled objects (Monday, 9 March)

Alexander Fritze

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Wednesday, 4 March)

Allen Wirfs-Brock

• Re: Creating entangled objects (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? (Monday, 9 March)

Andrea Giammarchi

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Sunday, 29 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Sunday, 29 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Cancelable promises (Friday, 27 February)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: A new hack for singleton objects (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: A new hack for singleton objects (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: A new hack for singleton objects (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: A new hack for singleton objects (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: Creating entangled objects (Thursday, 12 March)
• Cancelable promises (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: Getting rid of the separate concepts of setters and creators (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: WebIDL - passing undefined as optional nullable param (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: WebIDL - passing undefined as optional nullable param (Tuesday, 13 January)

Benjamin (Inglor) Gruenbaum

• Re: Cancelable promises (Saturday, 28 February)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: Allow partial enums in return values? (Saturday, 7 February)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: A new hack for singleton objects (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: A new hack for singleton objects (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: A new hack for singleton objects (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: A new hack for singleton objects (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: A new hack for singleton objects (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: Defining a [[Set]] internal method for platform objects (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: Defining a [[Set]] internal method for platform objects (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Global method calls (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Interaction of named properties and own properties in the [OverrideBuiltins] case seems weird (Thursday, 26 February)
• Interaction of named properties and own properties in the [OverrideBuiltins] case seems weird (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Global method calls (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Global method calls (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Defining a [[Set]] internal method for platform objects (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: Defining a [[Set]] internal method for platform objects (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: Getting rid of the separate concepts of setters and creators (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Defining a [[Set]] internal method for platform objects (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Getting rid of the separate concepts of setters and creators (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: Allow partial enums in return values? (Monday, 9 February)
• Re: classes and enumerability (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: WebIDL - passing undefined as optional nullable param (Tuesday, 13 January)

Brendan Eich

• Re: Creating entangled objects (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Creating entangled objects (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Global method calls (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 28 January)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 28328] New: Bad color contrast for code in note (Tuesday, 24 March)
• [Bug 20361] Grammar is wrong for serializers (Tuesday, 24 March)
• [Bug 20361] Grammar is wrong for serializers (Tuesday, 24 March)
• [Bug 20361] Grammar is wrong for serializers (Monday, 23 March)
• [Bug 20361] Grammar is wrong for serializers (Monday, 23 March)
• [Bug 28244] Requiring @@toStringTag on instances may have performance implications (Thursday, 19 March)
• [Bug 28244] New: Requiring @@toStringTag on instances may have performance implications (Thursday, 19 March)
• [Bug 26521] [[GetOwnProperty]] behavior for named properties is not web-compatible (Thursday, 12 March)
• [Bug 25025] Named creators with [OverrideBuiltins] don't work right as the spec is written now (Thursday, 12 March)
• [Bug 28124] New: Issues in 4.5.11 (Maplike) and 4.5.12 (Setlike) (Monday, 2 March)
• [Bug 28065] New: WebIDL: Grammar for readonly requires 2 token lookahead in some cases (Friday, 20 February)
• [Bug 28057] New: Support Promise subclass (Thursday, 19 February)
• [Bug 20019] Support subclassing ES6 Map (Thursday, 19 February)
• [Bug 27995] New: Consider adding some sort of shorthand for resolving a promise with an IDL value (Tuesday, 10 February)
• [Bug 25025] Named creators with [OverrideBuiltins] don't work right as the spec is written now (Monday, 9 February)
• [Bug 26521] [[GetOwnProperty]] behavior for named properties is not web-compatible (Monday, 9 February)
• [Bug 27988] New: Get rid of the separate concepts of "setters" and "creators" (Monday, 9 February)
• [Bug 27988] Get rid of the separate concepts of "setters" and "creators" (Monday, 9 February)
• [Bug 26521] [[GetOwnProperty]] behavior for named properties is not web-compatible (Monday, 9 February)
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new (Monday, 9 February)
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new (Monday, 9 February)
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new (Monday, 9 February)
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new (Monday, 9 February)
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new (Monday, 9 February)
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new (Monday, 9 February)
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new (Monday, 9 February)
• [Bug 27953] Dictionaries with required properties shouldn't need to be optional (Wednesday, 4 February)
• [Bug 27953] Dictionaries with required properties shouldn't need to be optional (Wednesday, 4 February)
• [Bug 27953] New: Dictionaries with required properties shouldn't need to be optional (Wednesday, 4 February)
• [Bug 22858] use @@hasInstance instead of [[HasInstance]] (Thursday, 29 January)
• [Bug 22858] use @@hasInstance instead of [[HasInstance]] (Thursday, 29 January)
• [Bug 22858] use @@hasInstance instead of [[HasInstance]] (Thursday, 29 January)
• [Bug 22858] use @@hasInstance instead of [[HasInstance]] (Thursday, 29 January)
• [Bug 22858] use @@hasInstance instead of [[HasInstance]] (Thursday, 29 January)
• [Bug 27905] /I/ in the definition of attribute setter is poorly defined (Tuesday, 27 January)
• [Bug 27906] New: "If validThis is false, then return." (Tuesday, 27 January)
• [Bug 27905] New: /I/ in the definition of attribute setter is poorly defined (Tuesday, 27 January)
• [Bug 27874] Microtasks and callbacks run from a queued task (Wednesday, 21 January)
• [Bug 27874] Microtasks and callbacks run from a queued task (Wednesday, 21 January)
• [Bug 27874] Microtasks and callbacks run from a queued task (Wednesday, 21 January)
• [Bug 27874] New: Microtasks and callbacks run from a queued task (Wednesday, 21 January)
• [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters (Tuesday, 20 January)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Saturday, 17 January)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Friday, 16 January)
• [Bug 27701] Enum should be allowed to end with comma (Thursday, 15 January)
• [Bug 27317] Provide explicit guidance on enum value naming (Thursday, 15 January)
• [Bug 27317] Provide explicit guidance on enum value naming (Thursday, 15 January)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Wednesday, 14 January)
• [Bug 27822] Define the [[Prototype]] of the interface object of an interface whose parent has NoInterfaceObject (Tuesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 23133] Hook up interface object proto chains as if they were ES6 classes (Tuesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 27822] New: Define the [[Prototype]] of the interface object of an interface whose parent has NoInterfaceObject (Tuesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 23133] Hook up interface object proto chains as if they were ES6 classes (Tuesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 23133] Hook up interface object proto chains as if they were ES6 classes (Tuesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 23133] Hook up interface object proto chains as if they were ES6 classes (Tuesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new (Tuesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 27553] Support Symbol (Friday, 9 January)
• [Bug 25312] allow trailing commas on enums (Wednesday, 7 January)
• [Bug 27701] Enum should be allowed to end with comma (Wednesday, 7 January)
• [Bug 27701] Enum should be allowed to end with comma (Tuesday, 6 January)
• [Bug 27749] "DOMException constructor object" as IDL (Monday, 5 January)
• [Bug 27749] "DOMException constructor object" as IDL (Monday, 5 January)
• [Bug 27749] New: "DOMException constructor object" as IDL (Monday, 5 January)
• [Bug 27062] DOMException constructor should allow name to be supplied (Saturday, 3 January)
• [Bug 27732] New: DOMException lost some constants. (Saturday, 3 January)

David Dorwin

• Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? (Monday, 2 March)

Dean Tribble

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)

Domenic Denicola

• RE: A new hack for singleton objects (Wednesday, 18 March)
• RE: A new hack for singleton objects (Wednesday, 18 March)
• RE: A new hack for singleton objects (Tuesday, 17 March)
• A new hack for singleton objects (Tuesday, 17 March)
• RE: Idiomatic representation of { buffer, bytesRead } (Thursday, 5 March)
• RE: Idiomatic representation of { buffer, bytesRead } (Wednesday, 4 March)
• RE: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Idiomatic representation of { buffer, bytesRead } (Monday, 2 March)
• RE: Cancelable promises (Sunday, 1 March)
• RE: Interaction of named properties and own properties in the [OverrideBuiltins] case seems weird (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Global method calls (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Global method calls (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: Global method calls (Sunday, 22 February)
• RE: Global method calls (Sunday, 22 February)
• RE: Global method calls (Sunday, 22 February)
• Global method calls (Sunday, 22 February)
• RE: Defining a [[Set]] internal method for platform objects (Tuesday, 10 February)
• RE: Defining a [[Set]] internal method for platform objects (Tuesday, 10 February)
• RE: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 14 January)

Elliott Sprehn

• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor (Tuesday, 24 March)

Frankie Bagnardi

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Sunday, 29 March)
• Re: Cancelable promises (Saturday, 28 February)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 14 January)

Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

• Allow partial enums in return values? (Thursday, 22 January)

Janusz Majnert

• Re: WebIDL - passing undefined as optional nullable param (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: WebIDL - passing undefined as optional nullable param (Tuesday, 13 January)
• WebIDL - passing undefined as optional nullable param (Tuesday, 13 January)

Jason Orendorff

• Re: Creating entangled objects (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Idiomatic representation of { buffer, bytesRead } (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: Idiomatic representation of { buffer, bytesRead } (Wednesday, 4 March)

John Lenz

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Tuesday, 3 March)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: Creating entangled objects (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Creating entangled objects (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Cancelable promises (Friday, 27 February)

Kevin Smith

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Cancelable promises (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Cancelable promises (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Cancelable promises (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: Cancelable promises (Friday, 27 February)

Marius Gundersen

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Tuesday, 3 March)

Mark Miller

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Global method calls (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Global method calls (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Global method calls (Sunday, 22 February)

Mark S. Miller

• Re: Creating entangled objects (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Creating entangled objects (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Creating entangled objects (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? (Monday, 9 March)
• Creating entangled objects (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• RE: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 14 January)

Olli Pettay

• Re: A new hack for singleton objects (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 14 January)

Rainer Schuster

• Eclipse based Web IDL IDE (Thursday, 5 February)

Robert O'Callahan

• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor (Thursday, 26 March)

Ron Buckton

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• RE: Cancelable promises (Saturday, 28 February)

Salvador de la Puente González

• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Cancelable promises (Saturday, 28 February)

Samuel Giles

• Re: Cancelable promises (Friday, 27 February)

Simon Pieters

• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [geometry] Dictionary argument for DOMQuad constructor (Wednesday, 25 March)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Web IDL maplike: Allow spec prose to specify how key-type should be compared? (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Cancellation architectural observations (Monday, 2 March)

Travis Leithead

• RE: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)
• RE: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Wednesday, 14 January)

Yehuda Katz

• Re: Figuring out the behavior of WindowProxy in the face of non-configurable properties (Thursday, 15 January)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2015 11:55:00 UTC