- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 02:56:30 +0100
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
* Boris Zbarsky wrote: >You say "every WindowProxy", but in practice in an ES implementation you >have some object, it has some internal methods. This is the last time >I'm bothering to go through this with you, since clearly we're getting >nowhere, as I said in https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27128 What are the odds that the behavior observable by web pages can actually be defined sanely such that ES invariants and compatibility requirements are satisfied? https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27128#c15 indicates, as I understand it, the odds may be quite good. In that case, looking for a volunteer to come up with a proposal might be a good next step. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de D-10243 Berlin · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de Available for hire in Berlin (early 2015) · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2015 01:57:21 UTC