- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 10:53:25 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27749 Bug ID: 27749 Summary: "DOMException constructor object" as IDL Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: WebIDL Assignee: cam@mcc.id.au Reporter: simonp@opera.com QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-script-coord@w3.org https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#es-DOMException-constructor-object [[ DOMException constructor object ]] Why is DOMException specified as prose instead of as IDL (with prose for things not expressable in IDL, if anything)? Having it as IDL has the advantage of being easier to test and maybe also implement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 5 January 2015 10:53:27 UTC