- From: Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 19:22:01 -0800
- To: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>
- CC: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
Mark S. Miller wrote: > The reason why the intent is unwarranted is that the descriptor omits > "configurable:" rather than explicitly saying "configurable: true". If > the owner object already has a configurable own property of the same > name, then a defineProperty where the "configurable:" is omitted > defines an own property preserving the configurability of the original > own property. Wild, and genius. How many more narrow escapes can we make and keep both web compat and integrity? :-P Is there any downside? What is the bad case that observably changes behavior, if any (not involving proxies)? I'm too tired to search the state space right now, throwing this out as a challenge. /be
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2015 03:22:39 UTC