public-rif-wg@w3.org from November 2006 by date

Tuesday, 28 November 2006

• Re: asn06/OWL vs. UML [was: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?)] Chris Welty

Wednesday, 29 November 2006

• Re: Thoughts on abstract syntax Dave Reynolds
• Thoughts on abstract syntax Chris Welty

Tuesday, 28 November 2006

• Re: [TED] Question on constraints Hassan Aït-Kaci
• Re: [TED] Question on constraints Christian de Sainte Marie
• Homework for next week's telecon Chris Welty

Monday, 27 November 2006

• ACTION-190 Completed Ginsberg, Allen
• ACTION-189 Completed Ginsberg, Allen
• [UCR] Edit Use Cases Wiki Pages Ginsberg, Allen
• RE: http://www.w3.org/2006/11/04-rif-minutes.html#action04: Notes from UCR breakout of 11/04 --> coverage Paul Vincent

Sunday, 26 November 2006

• RE: [TED] CORE Pages on Positive Conditions and Horn Rules Edited: Slots & Constraints Gerd Wagner

Wednesday, 22 November 2006

• RE: http://www.w3.org/2006/11/04-rif-minutes.html#action04: Notes from UCR breakout of 11/04 --> coverage Ginsberg, Allen
• RE: http://www.w3.org/2006/11/04-rif-minutes.html#action04: Notes from UCR breakout of 11/04 --> coverage Paul Vincent
• test, please ignore Francois Bry (Bry-Haußer)
• Re: asn0n vs OWL vs. UML Dave Reynolds
• RE: asn0n vs OWL vs. UML Paul Vincent
• Re: asn06/OWL vs. UML [was: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?)] Dave Reynolds
• RE: asn06/OWL vs. UML [was: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?)] Gerd Wagner
• Re: asn06/OWL vs. UML [was: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?)] Dave Reynolds

Tuesday, 21 November 2006

• [Admin] draft minutes from 21 Nov 2006 telecon Stella Mitchell
• RE: [RIFRAF] Response to ACTION-179 --> CEP discussion Alex Kozlenkov
• RE: asn06/OWL vs. UML [was: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?)] Gerd Wagner
• RE: [RIFRAF] Response to ACTION-179 --> CEP discussion Paul Vincent
• Re: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?) Dave Reynolds
• Re: [Admin] RIF telecon November 28 CANCELLED (correction) Christian de Sainte Marie
• RE: [RIFRAF] Response to ACTION-179 Alex Kozlenkov
• RE: [RIFRAF] Response to ACTION-179 Paul Vincent
• RE: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?) Paul Vincent
• ACTION-185 closed Hassan Aït-Kaci
• [Admin] RIF telecon November 28 CANCELLED Christian de Sainte Marie
• [Fwd: minutes of RIF telecon of 14 Nov 2006] Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• [F2F] Process to decide F2F5 date and location (action 183) Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?) Michael Sintek
• Re: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?) Dave Reynolds
• Re: [RIFRAF] Response to ACTION-179 Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Re: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?) Dave Reynolds
• Re: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?) Sandro Hawke
• Re: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?) Christian de Sainte Marie
• RE: [RIFRAF] Response to ACTION-179 Alex Kozlenkov
• Re: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?) Michael Sintek
• Re: [TED] CORE Pages on Positive Conditions and Horn Rules Edited: Slots & Constraints Christian de Sainte Marie
• RE: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?) Philippe Bonnard
• Re: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?) Dave Reynolds
• Re: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?) Sandro Hawke
• [UCR] Black boxes, surprises and action 41 Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: [TED] CORE Pages on Positive Conditions and Horn Rules Edited: Slots & Constraints Michael Kifer
• Re: [TED] CORE Pages on Positive Conditions and Horn Rules Edited: Slots & Constraints Michael Kifer
• [RIFRAF] Response to ACTION-179 Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Re: asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?) Dave Reynolds
• [UCR] Requirements' list updated for UC2 Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Call for Papers - CENT 2007 Axel Polleres
• asn06 take 2 (Abstract Syntax as a kind of ontology?) Sandro Hawke
• RE: [TED] CORE Pages on Positive Conditions and Horn Rules Edited:Slots & Constraints Boley, Harold
• Re: [TED] CORE Pages on Positive Conditions and Horn Rules Edited: Slots & Constraints Hassan Aït-Kaci
• CfP: ESWC 2007 - 4th European Semantic Web Conference Enrico Franconi
• RE: [TED] CORE Pages on Positive Conditions and Horn Rules Edited: Slots & Constraints Boley, Harold

Monday, 20 November 2006

• Dates set for January @ MIT (ACTION-121 DONE) Sandro Hawke
• Re: [TED] CORE Pages on Positive Conditions and Horn Rules Edited: Slots & Constraints cawelty@frontiernet.net
• [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 21 November Christian de Sainte Marie

Sunday, 19 November 2006

• Re: [TED] CORE Pages on Positive Conditions and Horn Rules Edited: Slots & Constraints Dave Reynolds

Thursday, 16 November 2006

• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• [TED] CORE Pages on Positive Conditions and Horn Rules Edited: Slots & Constraints Boley, Harold

Wednesday, 15 November 2006

• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Chris Welty
• Re: Your RuleML presentation (ACTION on hak) Pascal Hitzler

Tuesday, 14 November 2006

• Your RuleML presentation (ACTION on hak) Hassan Aït-Kaci
• Re: Forward-Compatibility (Extensibility) Requirement & Proposal Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Michael Kifer
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Sandro Hawke
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Chris Welty
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Hassan Aït-Kaci

Monday, 13 November 2006

• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Michael Kifer
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Chris Welty
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Michael Kifer
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Michael Sintek
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Michael Kifer
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Dave Reynolds
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Sandro Hawke
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Michael Kifer
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Chris Welty
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Dan Connolly
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Sandro Hawke
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Sandro Hawke
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Michael Sintek
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Sandro Hawke
• [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 14 November Christian de Sainte Marie
• [Admin] Homework for tomorrow's telecon Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: resolutions Sandro Hawke
• Re: resolutions Dave Reynolds
• Re: resolutions Sandro Hawke
• Re: resolutions Dave Reynolds

Sunday, 12 November 2006

• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Hassan Aït-Kaci
• RE: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Gerd Wagner
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Michael Kifer
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Dan Connolly
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Michael Kifer
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Sandro Hawke
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Michael Kifer

Saturday, 11 November 2006

• RE: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Boley, Harold
• Re: proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Axel Polleres
• Re: resolutions Adrian GIURCA
• Re: resolutions Francis McCabe
• Re: resolutions Dave Reynolds

Thursday, 9 November 2006

• Re: Forward-Compatibility (Extensibility) Requirement & Proposal Dave Reynolds
• proposed: use abstract syntax notation (asn06) Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 8 November 2006

• resolutions Sandro Hawke
• Forward-Compatibility (Extensibility) Requirement & Proposal Sandro Hawke
• Notes from the breakout session on syntactic issues Nov 4, 2006 Alex Kozlenkov
• Special Int. Event "Reaction RuleML" at ISWC'06 Alex Kozlenkov

Monday, 6 November 2006

• Re: [TED] Slides of F2F4 Breakout on Abstract Syntax and Semantics: Slots & Constraints Dave Reynolds
• Re: [TED] Slides of F2F4 Breakout on Abstract Syntax and Semantics: Slots & Constraints Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: [TED] Slides of F2F4 Breakout on Abstract Syntax and Semantics: Slots & Constraints Dave Reynolds
• [TED] Slides of F2F4 Breakout on Abstract Syntax and Semantics: Slots & Constraints Boley, Harold
• Re: receipts for RIF F2F WG Christian de Sainte Marie
• receipts for RIF F2F WG Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 5 November 2006

• [RIFRAF] notes from f2f RIFRAF breakout session Axel Polleres
• Summary of extensibility/dialect breakout group Dave Reynolds
• Syntax breakout resolutions Dave Reynolds
• Institutions (global & local naming) Hassan Aït-Kaci
• Notes from UCR breakout of 11/04 Ginsberg, Allen

Saturday, 4 November 2006

• text from naming breakout Sandro Hawke
• H2F stuff Hassan Aït-Kaci
• registration confirmation message Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [F2F4] Objective, agenda, work items slides Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• [F2F4] Requirements slides Christian de Sainte Marie
• [F2F4] Objective, agenda, work items slides Christian de Sainte Marie

Friday, 3 November 2006

• information on the Classic Center (venue for F2F4) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: FLogic interchange examples Gerd Wagner
• ACTION-153 done Ginsberg, Allen
• CLP_Formulation (ACTION-163) Hassan Aït-Kaci
• ACTION-158 completed Axel Polleres

Thursday, 2 November 2006

• Re: FLogic interchange examples Michael Kifer
• RE: FLogic interchange examples Gerd Wagner
• Re: [TED] An alternative proposal for the technical design Michael Kifer
• Re: FLogic interchange examples Michael Kifer
• 3rd draft of Minutes for 24 October 2006 Gary Hallmark

Wednesday, 1 November 2006

• RE: [RIF] Welcome to RIF Moore, Bob
• RE: FLogic interchange examples Gerd Wagner

Last message date: Thursday, 30 November 2006 13:46:47 UTC