- From: Adrian GIURCA <giurca@tu-cottbus.de>
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:39:11 +0100
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Dear Dave and all, Here is a REWERSE I1 contribution to the UCR 2.1 <http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-rif-ucr-20060710/#Negotiating_eBusiness_Contracts_Across_Rule_Platforms>: Interchanging between JBoss Rules and F-Logic <http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/R2ML/JBossRules.xhtml> where we discuss also capability of RIF to share/interchange vocabularies. Following the experience from R2ML we have a proposal <http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/R2ML/REWERSEProposal.xhtml>for a vocabulary EBNF. -Adrian Giurca Dave Reynolds wrote: > > Sandro Hawke wrote: > >> Chris posted the resultions to the wiki: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/F2F4 >> >> (posted for him, since his e-mail isn't working.) > > > Whilst not a resolution, another outcome of the meeting for me was the > realization/suggestion that RIF needs a library of components that can > be reused across dialects. This would include: > > - syntax components > (within the extensible syntax framework) > > - metadata vocabulary elements > (including the compatibility categories, and native<->RIF mapping > metadata) > > - selected datatypes > (we have already selected XSD but haven't spelled out the > precise subset to be supported) > > - associated datatype functions > (presumably drawn from XQuery functions and operators) > > Since the terminology "core" has already been taken we need a name for > this "shared RIF stuff". RIFLib? RIF Vocabulary? > > Dave >
Received on Saturday, 11 November 2006 18:39:34 UTC