- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:38:58 +0000
- To: Francis McCabe <frankmccabe@sandsoft.com>
- Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Francis McCabe wrote: > How about Rule Ontology? Of course, though that's presumably already in progress with RIFRAF. Dave > On Nov 11, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote: > >> >> Sandro Hawke wrote: >>> Chris posted the resultions to the wiki: >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/F2F4 >>> (posted for him, since his e-mail isn't working.) >> >> Whilst not a resolution, another outcome of the meeting for me was the >> realization/suggestion that RIF needs a library of components that can >> be reused across dialects. This would include: >> >> - syntax components >> (within the extensible syntax framework) >> >> - metadata vocabulary elements >> (including the compatibility categories, and native<->RIF mapping >> metadata) >> >> - selected datatypes >> (we have already selected XSD but haven't spelled out the >> precise subset to be supported) >> >> - associated datatype functions >> (presumably drawn from XQuery functions and operators) >> >> Since the terminology "core" has already been taken we need a name for >> this "shared RIF stuff". RIFLib? RIF Vocabulary? >> >> Dave >> >> >
Received on Monday, 13 November 2006 08:39:11 UTC