- From: Francis McCabe <frankmccabe@sandsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:19:27 -0800
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
How about Rule Ontology? On Nov 11, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote: > > Sandro Hawke wrote: >> Chris posted the resultions to the wiki: >> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/F2F4 >> (posted for him, since his e-mail isn't working.) > > Whilst not a resolution, another outcome of the meeting for me was > the realization/suggestion that RIF needs a library of components > that can be reused across dialects. This would include: > > - syntax components > (within the extensible syntax framework) > > - metadata vocabulary elements > (including the compatibility categories, and native<->RIF mapping > metadata) > > - selected datatypes > (we have already selected XSD but haven't spelled out the > precise subset to be supported) > > - associated datatype functions > (presumably drawn from XQuery functions and operators) > > Since the terminology "core" has already been taken we need a name > for this "shared RIF stuff". RIFLib? RIF Vocabulary? > > Dave > >
Received on Saturday, 11 November 2006 18:19:41 UTC