- From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:40:12 +0100
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: "Boley, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>, RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Dave Reynolds wrote: > > Boley, Harold wrote: > >> Please find attached the slides (both pdf and ppt versions) of our >> F2F4 Breakout on Abstract Syntax and Semantics: Slots & Constraints, >> updated on the basis of the plenary debrief yesterday. >> >> -- Harold > > > Thanks. > > Just a side comment, not related to the main content of the proposal, > but it's not clear to me why you argue that keyed-slots are particularly > motivated by RDF. [...] However, we have enough problems helping people > understand that RDF is not an object model that I'd like to avoid mixed > messages on that, it might be simplest to drop that motivation from any > external documents. Hmmm... Charter says [1]: "In order to allow interoperability with RDF and object-oriented systems, the syntax must support named arguments (also called "role" or "slot" names), allowing n-ary facts, rules, and queries to be provided through property/value interfaces." [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/charter#xml-syntax Christian
Received on Monday, 6 November 2006 21:40:34 UTC