- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:22:17 -0500
- To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer)
- Cc: Michael Sintek <sintek@dfki.uni-kl.de>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hassan_A=EFt-Kaci?= <hak@ilog.com>, Gerd Wagner <wagnerg@tu-cottbus.de>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
> > rif:Quantif sl:subClassOf rif:Condit .
> > rif:? sl:domain rif:Quantif ;
> > sl:range rif:Var ;
> > sl:minCardinality 1 .
> > ...
>
> Looking at such a syntax and comparing it to BNF, my reaction is:
> why the hell do we need this trouble?
I see Michael Sintek's point to be that there is abstract syntax for
abstract syntax languages. He's showing what triples could be behind
asn06, EBNF-with-role-names, etc. It's an interesting point, of course.
Meanwhile, I'm proposing asn06 -- with a fairly-reasable concrete syntax
-- not this turtle serialization of the data serialized by asn06.
-- Sandro
Received on Monday, 13 November 2006 21:23:03 UTC