- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:52:13 +0000
- To: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- CC: "Boley, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>, RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Christian de Sainte Marie wrote: > > Dave Reynolds wrote: > >> >> Boley, Harold wrote: >> >>> Please find attached the slides (both pdf and ppt versions) of our >>> F2F4 Breakout on Abstract Syntax and Semantics: Slots & Constraints, >>> updated on the basis of the plenary debrief yesterday. >>> >>> -- Harold >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> Just a side comment, not related to the main content of the proposal, >> but it's not clear to me why you argue that keyed-slots are >> particularly motivated by RDF. [...] However, we have enough problems >> helping people >> understand that RDF is not an object model that I'd like to avoid >> mixed messages on that, it might be simplest to drop that motivation >> from any external documents. > > Hmmm... Charter says [1]: > "In order to allow interoperability with RDF and object-oriented > systems, the syntax must support named arguments (also called "role" or > "slot" names), allowing n-ary facts, rules, and queries to be provided > through property/value interfaces." > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/charter#xml-syntax I'm aware of that and I wasn't happy with that either :-) Dave
Received on Monday, 6 November 2006 21:52:48 UTC