Sunday, 25 September 2011
Tuesday, 27 September 2011
Monday, 26 September 2011
Sunday, 25 September 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
Thursday, 22 September 2011
Wednesday, 21 September 2011
- Re: vocab entailment question
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
- vocab entailment question
- Re: Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107)
- Re: Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107)
- Re: Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107)
Tuesday, 20 September 2011
Monday, 19 September 2011
- Re: Draft response to ISSUE-105: @itemref support
- Re: Draft response to ISSUE-105: @itemref support
- Telecon Agenda - September 22nd 2011, 1400 UTC
Friday, 16 September 2011
- Re: Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107)
- Re: Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107)
- Re: Regrets for 9/22 telecon
- Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107)
- Regrets for 9/22 telecon
- Re: Handling of @src (ISSUE-107)
- Re: Some concerns about the list implementation in RDFa 1.1
- Re: Handling of @src (ISSUE-107)
Thursday, 15 September 2011
- Re: Some concerns about the list implementation in RDFa 1.1
- Re: Draft response to ISSUE-105: @itemref support
- Re: charter issue on @src
- charter issue on @src
- Re: Some concerns about the list implementation in RDFa 1.1
- Some concerns about the list implementation in RDFa 1.1
Wednesday, 14 September 2011
- Telecon Agenda - September 15th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Draft response to ISSUE-105: @itemref support
- Re: netlabs.org RDF/RDFa API implementation
Tuesday, 13 September 2011
Monday, 12 September 2011
- Re: Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106)
- Re 2: Vocabulary caching
- Re: Vocabulary caching
- Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-104: Determine if RDFa should normatively state that <link> and <meta> elements are supported in flow content.
- Re: Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Handling of @src (ISSUE-107)
- Re: Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106)
Sunday, 11 September 2011
- Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-104: Determine if RDFa should normatively state that <link> and <meta> elements are supported in flow content.
- Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-104: Determine if RDFa should normatively state that <link> and <meta> elements are supported in flow content.
Saturday, 10 September 2011
- Re: Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-104: Determine if RDFa should normatively state that <link> and <meta> elements are supported in flow content.
- Re: Handling of @src (ISSUE-107)
- Re: Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Handling of @src (ISSUE-107)
- Re: Handling of @src (ISSUE-107)
- Handling of @src (ISSUE-107)
- Re: Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106)
- Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Major overhaul of the RDFa primer
Friday, 9 September 2011
- Re: Major overhaul of the RDFa primer
- Re: Major overhaul of the RDFa primer
- Re: Major overhaul of the RDFa primer
- Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-104: Determine if RDFa should normatively state that <link> and <meta> elements are supported in flow content.
- Major overhaul of the RDFa primer
Thursday, 8 September 2011
Wednesday, 7 September 2011
- Telecon Agenda - September 8th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
Tuesday, 6 September 2011
- Re: Updated the primer
- Re: Updated the primer
- Updated the primer
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
- Re 2: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
Monday, 5 September 2011
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re 2: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context (related to ISSUE-105))
- Re: RDFa complexity (Was: Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context (related to ISSUE-105))
Sunday, 4 September 2011
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- RDFa complexity (Was: Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context (related to ISSUE-105))
Saturday, 3 September 2011
Friday, 2 September 2011
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re: @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
Thursday, 1 September 2011
- @itemref functionality wrt itemtype context
- Re: Modified proposal for 'provenance triple', ISSUE-110
- Re: Modified proposal for 'provenance triple', ISSUE-110
- Re: Modified proposal for 'provenance triple', ISSUE-110
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Spec update with vocabulary expansion